Importing IEEE XES files

import pm4py
if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes('tests/input_data/running-example.xes')

Importing CSV files

import pandas as pd
import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    dataframe = pd.read_csv('tests/input_data/running-example.csv', sep=',')
    dataframe = pm4py.format_dataframe(dataframe, case_id='case:concept:name', activity_key='concept:name', timestamp_key='time:timestamp')
    event_log = pm4py.convert_to_event_log(dataframe)

import pandas as pd
import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    dataframe = pd.read_csv('tests/input_data/running-example-transformed.csv', sep=',')
    dataframe = dataframe.rename(columns={'clientID': 'case:clientID'})
    dataframe = pm4py.format_dataframe(dataframe, case_id='CaseID', activity_key='Activity', timestamp_key='Timestamp')
    event_log = pm4py.convert_to_event_log(dataframe)

Converting Event Data

import pm4py
if __name__ == "__main__":
    event_log = pm4py.convert_to_event_log(dataframe)

import pm4py
if __name__ == "__main__":
    event_stream = pm4py.convert_to_event_stream(dataframe)

import pm4py
if __name__ == "__main__":
    dataframe = pm4py.convert_to_dataframe(dataframe)

Exporting IEEE XES files

import pm4py
if __name__ == "__main__":
    pm4py.write_xes(log, 'exported.xes')

Exporting logs to CSV

import pandas as pd
import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    dataframe = pm4py.convert_to_dataframe(log)
    dataframe.to_csv('exported.csv')
                                

I/O with Other File Types

Filtering on timeframe

In the following paragraph, various methods regarding filtering with time frames are present. For each of the methods, the log and Pandas Dataframe methods are revealed.

import pm4py
if __name__ == "__main__":
    filtered_log = pm4py.filter_time_range(log, "2011-03-09 00:00:00", "2012-01-18 23:59:59", mode='traces_contained')

import pm4py
if __name__ == "__main__":
    filtered_log = pm4py.filter_time_range(log, "2011-03-09 00:00:00", "2012-01-18 23:59:59", mode='traces_intersecting')

import pm4py
if __name__ == "__main__":
    filtered_log = pm4py.filter_time_range(log, "2011-03-09 00:00:00", "2012-01-18 23:59:59", mode='events')

Filter on case performance

import pm4py
if __name__ == "__main__":
    filtered_log = pm4py.filter_case_performance(log, 86400, 864000)

Filter on start activities

In general, pm4py is able to filter a log or a dataframe on start activities.

import pm4py
if __name__ == "__main__":
    log_start = pm4py.get_start_activities(log)
    filtered_log = pm4py.filter_start_activities(log, ["S1"]) #suppose "S1" is the start activity you want to filter on

Filter on end activities

In general, pm4py offers the possibility to filter a log or a dataframe on end activities.

import pm4py
if __name__ == "__main__":
    end_activities = pm4py.get_end_activities(log)
    filtered_log = pm4py.filter_end_activities(log, ["pay compensation"])

Filter on variants

A variant is a set of cases that share the same control-flow perspective, so a set of cases that share the same classified events (activities) in the same order. In this section, we will focus for all methods first on log objects, then we will continue with the dataframe.

import pm4py
if __name__ == "__main__":
    variants = pm4py.get_variants(log)

import pm4py
if __name__ == "__main__":
    variants = pm4py.filter_variants(log, ["A,B,C,D", "A,E,F,G", "A,C,D"])

Other variants-based filters are offered.

import pm4py
if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes("tests/input_data/receipt.xes")
    k = 2
    filtered_log = pm4py.filter_variants_top_k(log, k)

import pm4py
if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes("tests/input_data/receipt.xes")
    perc = 0.1
    filtered_log = pm4py.filter_variants_by_coverage_percentage(log, perc)
                            

Filter on attributes values

Filtering on attributes values permits alternatively to:

• Keep cases that contains at least an event with one of the given attribute values
• Remove cases that contains an event with one of the the given attribute values
• Keep events (trimming traces) that have one of the given attribute values
• Remove events (trimming traces) that have one of the given attribute values

Example of attributes are the resource (generally contained in org:resource attribute) and the activity (generally contained in concept:name attribute). As noted before, the first method can be applied on log objects, the second on dataframe objects.

import pm4py
if __name__ == "__main__":
    activities = pm4py.get_event_attribute_values(log, "concept:name")
    resources = pm4py.get_event_attribute_values(log, "org:resource")

if __name__ == "__main__":
    tracefilter_log_pos = pm4py.filter_event_attribute_values(log, "org:resource", ["Resource10"], level="case", retain=True)
    tracefilter_log_neg = pm4py.filter_event_attribute_values(log, "org:resource", ["Resource10"], level="case", retain=False)

if __name__ == "__main__":
    tracefilter_log_pos = pm4py.filter_event_attribute_values(log, "org:resource", ["Resource10"], level="event", retain=True)
    tracefilter_log_neg = pm4py.filter_event_attribute_values(log, "org:resource", ["Resource10"], level="event", retain=False)

Filter on numeric attribute values

Filtering on numeric attribute values provide options that are similar to filtering on string attribute values (that we already considered).

import os
import pandas as pd
import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    df = pd.read_csv(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "roadtraffic100traces.csv"))
    df = pm4py.format_dataframe(df)

    from pm4py.algo.filtering.pandas.attributes import attributes_filter
    filtered_df_events = attributes_filter.apply_numeric_events(df, 34, 36,
                                                 parameters={attributes_filter.Parameters.CASE_ID_KEY: "case:concept:name", attributes_filter.Parameters.ATTRIBUTE_KEY: "amount"})

    filtered_df_cases = attributes_filter.apply_numeric(df, 34, 36,
                                                 parameters={attributes_filter.Parameters.CASE_ID_KEY: "case:concept:name", attributes_filter.Parameters.ATTRIBUTE_KEY: "amount"})

    filtered_df_cases = attributes_filter.apply_numeric(df, 34, 500,
                                                 parameters={attributes_filter.Parameters.CASE_ID_KEY: "case:concept:name", attributes_filter.Parameters.ATTRIBUTE_KEY: "amount",
                                                             attributes_filter.Parameters.STREAM_FILTER_KEY1: "concept:name",
                                                             attributes_filter.Parameters.STREAM_FILTER_VALUE1: "Add penalty"})

Between Filter

The between filter transforms the event log by identifying, in the current set of cases, all the subcases going from a source activity to a target activity.

This is useful to analyse in detail the behavior in the log between such couple of activities (e.g., the throughput time, which activities are included, the level of conformance).

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes("tests/input_data/running-example.xes")

    filtered_log = pm4py.filter_between(log, "check ticket", "decide")
                                

Case Size Filter

The case size filter keeps only the cases in the log with a number of events included in a range that is specified by the user.

This can have two purposes: eliminating cases that are too short (which are obviously incomplete or outliers), or are too long (too much rework).

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes("tests/input_data/running-example.xes")

    filtered_log = pm4py.filter_case_size(log, 5, 10)
                                

Rework Filter

The filter described in this section has the purpose to identify the cases where a given activity has been repeated.

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes("tests/input_data/running-example.xes")

    filtered_log = pm4py.filter_activities_rework(log, "reinitiate request", 2)
                                

Paths Performance Filter

The paths performance filter identifies the cases in which a given path between two activities takes a duration that is included in a range that is specified by the user.

This can be useful to identify the cases in which a large amount of time is passed between two activities.

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes("tests/input_data/running-example.xes")

    filtered_log = pm4py.filter_paths_performance(log, ("decide", "pay compensation"), 2*86400, 10*86400)
                                

Motivation

Traditional event logs, used by mainstream process mining techniques, require the events to be related to a case. A case is a set of events for a particular purpose. A case notion is a criteria to assign a case to the events.

However, in real processes this leads to two problems:

• If we consider the Order-to-Cash process, an order could be related to many different deliveries. If we consider the delivery as case notion, the same event of Create Order needs to be replicated in different cases (all the deliveries involving the order). This is called the convergence problem.
• If we consider the Order-to-Cash process, an order could contain different order items, each one with a different lifecycle. If we consider the order as case notion, several instances of the activities for the single items may be contained in the case, and this make the frequency/performance annotation of the process problematic. This is called the divergence problem.

Object-centric event logs relax the assumption that an event is related to exactly one case. Indeed, an event can be related to different objects of different object types.

Essentially, we can describe the different components of an object-centric event log as:

• Events, having an identifier, an activity, a timestamp, a list of related objects and a dictionary of other attributes.
• Objects, having an identifier, a type and a dictionary of other attributes.
• Attribute names, e.g., the possible keys for the attributes of the event/object attribute map.
• Object types, e.g., the possible types for the objects.

Supported Formats

Several historical formats (OpenSLEX, XOC) have been proposed for the storage of object-centric event logs. In particular, the OCEL standard proposes lean and intercompatible formats for the storage of object-centric event logs. These include:

• XML-OCEL: a storage format based on XML for object-centric event logs. An example of XML-OCEL event log is reported here.
• JSON-OCEL: a storage format based on JSON for object-centric event logs. An example of JSON-OCEL event log is reported here.

Among the commonalities of these formats, the event/object identifier is ocel:id, the activity identifier is ocel:activity, the timestamp of the event is ocel:timestamp, the type of the object is ocel:type. Moreover, the list of related objects for the events is identified by ocel:omap, the attribute map for the events is identified by ocel:vmap, the attribute map for the objects is identified by ocel:ovmap.

Ignoring the attributes at the object level, we can also represent the object-centric event log in a CSV format (an example is reported here). There, a row represent an event, where the event identifier is ocel:eid, and the related objects for a given type OTYPE are reported as a list under the voice ocel:type:OTYPE.

Importing/Export OCELs

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    path = "tests/input_data/ocel/example_log.jsonocel"
    ocel = pm4py.read_ocel(path)
                                

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    path = "./output.jsonocel"
    pm4py.write_ocel(ocel, path)
                                

Basic Statistics on OCELs

We offer some basic statistics that can be calculated on OCELs.

if __name__ == "__main__":
    print(ocel)
                                

In the previous case, some statistics will be printed as follows:

Object-Centric Event Log (number of events: 23, number of objects: 15, number of activities: 15, number of object types: 3, events-objects relationships: 39)
Activities occurrences: {'Create Order': 3, 'Create Delivery': 3, 'Delivery Successful': 3, 'Invoice Sent': 2, 'Payment Reminder': 2, 'Confirm Order': 1, 'Item out of Stock': 1, 'Item back in Stock': 1, 'Delivery Failed': 1, 'Retry Delivery': 1, 'Pay Order': 1, 'Remove Item': 1, 'Cancel Order': 1, 'Add Item to Order': 1, 'Send for Credit Collection': 1}
Object types occurrences: {'element': 9, 'order': 3, 'delivery': 3}
Please use ocel.get_extended_table() to get a dataframe representation of the events related to the objects.

if __name__ == "__main__":
    attribute_names = pm4py.ocel_get_attribute_names(ocel)
                                

if __name__ == "__main__":
    attribute_names = pm4py.ocel_get_object_types(ocel)
                                

if __name__ == "__main__":
    object_type_activities = pm4py.ocel_object_type_activities(ocel)
                                

if __name__ == "__main__":
    ocel_objects_ot_count = pm4py.ocel_objects_ot_count(ocel)
                                

if __name__ == "__main__":
    temporal_summary = pm4py.ocel_temporal_summary(ocel)
                                

if __name__ == "__main__":
    temporal_summary = pm4py.ocel_objects_summary(ocel)
                                

Internal Data Structure

In this section, we describe the data structure used in pm4py to store object-centric event logs. We have in total three Pandas dataframes:

• The events dataframe: this stores a row for each event. Each row contains the event identifier (ocel:eid), the activity (ocel:activity), the timestamp (ocel:timestamp), and the values for the other event attributes (one per column).
• The objects dataframe: this stores a row for each object. Each row contains the object identifier (ocel:oid), the type (ocel:type), and the values for the object attributes (one per column).
• The relations dataframe: this stores a row for every relation event->object. Each row contains the event identifier (ocel:eid), the object identifier (ocel:oid), the type of the related object (ocel:type).

These dataframes can be accessed as properties of the OCEL object (e.g., ocel.events, ocel.objects, ocel.relations), and be obviously used for any purposes (filtering, discovery).

Filtering Object-Centric Event Logs

In this section, we describe some filtering operations available in pm4py and specific for object-centric event logs. There are filters at three levels:

• Filters at the event level (operating first at the ocel.events structure and then propagating the result to the other parts of the object-centric log).
• Filters at the object level (operating first at the ocel.objects structure and then propagating the result to the other parts of the object-centric log).
• Filters at the relations level (operating first at the ocel.relations structure and then propagating the result to the other parts of the object-centric log).

Filter on Event Attributes

if __name__ == "__main__":
    filtered_ocel = pm4py.filter_ocel_event_attribute(ocel, "ocel:activity", ["Create Fine", "Send Fine"], positive=True)
                                

Filter on Object Attributes

if __name__ == "__main__":
    filtered_ocel = pm4py.filter_ocel_object_attribute(ocel, "ocel:type", ["order", "delivery"], positive=True)
                                

Filter on Allowed Activities per Object Type

if __name__ == "__main__":
    filtered_ocel = pm4py.filter_ocel_object_types_allowed_activities(ocel, {"order": ["Create Order"], "item": ["Create Order", "Create Delivery"]})
                                

Filter on the Number of Objects per Type

if __name__ == "__main__":
    filtered_ocel = pm4py.filter_ocel_object_per_type_count(ocel, {"order": 1, "element": 2})
                                

Filter on Start/End Events per Object

if __name__ == "__main__":
    filtered_ocel = pm4py.filter_ocel_start_events_per_object_type(ocel, "order")
    filtered_ocel = pm4py.filter_ocel_end_events_per_object_type(ocel, "order")
                                

Filter on Event Timestamp

if __name__ == "__main__":
    filtered_ocel = pm4py.filter_ocel_events_timestamp(ocel, "1981-01-01 00:00:00", "1982-01-01 00:00:00", timestamp_key="ocel:timestamp")
                                

Filter on Object Types

if __name__ == "__main__":
    filtered_ocel = pm4py.filter_ocel_object_types(ocel, ['order', 'element'])
                                

Filter on Event Identifiers

if __name__ == "__main__":
    filtered_ocel = pm4py.filter_ocel_events(ocel, ['e1', 'e2'])
                                

Filter on Connected Components

if __name__ == "__main__":
    filtered_ocel = pm4py.filter_ocel_cc_object(ocel, 'o1')
                                

Filter on Object Identifiers

if __name__ == "__main__":
    filtered_ocel = pm4py.filter_ocel_objects(ocel, ['o1', 'i1'])
                                

if __name__ == "__main__":
    filtered_ocel = pm4py.filter_ocel_objects(ocel, ['o1'], level=2)
                                

Sampling on the Events

if __name__ == "__main__":
    filtered_ocel = pm4py.sample_events(ocel, num_events=100)
                                

Flattening to a Traditional Log

Flattening permits to convert an object-centric event log to a traditional event log with the specification of an object type. This allows for the application of traditional process mining techniques to the flattened log.

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    ocel = pm4py.read_ocel("tests/input_data/ocel/example_log.jsonocel")
    flattened_log = pm4py.ocel_flattening(ocel, "order")
                                

Timestamp-Based Interleavings

The situation in which an object-centric event log is produced directly at the extraction phase from the information systems is uncommon. Extractors for this settings are quite uncommon nowadays.

More frequent is the situation where some event logs can be extracted from the system and then their cases are related. So we can use the classical extractors to extract the event logs, and additionally extract only the relationships between the cases.

This information can be used to mine the relationships between events. In particular, the method of timestamp-based interleavings can be used. These consider the temporal flow between the different processes, based on the provided case relations: you can go from the left-process to the right-process, and from the right-process to the left-process.

In the following, we will assume the cases to be Pandas dataframes (with the classical pm4py naming convention, e.g. case:concept:name, concept:name and time:timestamp) and a case relations dataframe is defined between them (with the related cases being expressed respectively as case:concept:name_LEFT and case:concept:name_RIGHT.

import pandas as pd
import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    dataframe1 = pd.read_csv("tests/input_data/interleavings/receipt_even.csv")
    dataframe1 = pm4py.format_dataframe(dataframe1)
    dataframe2 = pd.read_csv("tests/input_data/interleavings/receipt_odd.csv")
    dataframe2 = pm4py.format_dataframe(dataframe2)
    case_relations = pd.read_csv("tests/input_data/interleavings/case_relations.csv")

    from pm4py.algo.discovery.ocel.interleavings import algorithm as interleavings_discovery
    interleavings = interleavings_discovery.apply(dataframe1, dataframe2, case_relations)
                                

The resulting interleavings dataframe will contain several columns, including for each row (that is a couple of related events, the first belonging to the first dataframe, the second belonging to the second dataframe):

• All the columns of the event (of the interleaving) of the first dataframe (with prefix LEFT).
• All the columns of the event (of the interleaving) of the second dataframe (with prefix RIGHT).
• The column @@direction indicating the direction of the interleaving (with LR we go left-to-right so from the first dataframe to the second dataframe; with RL we go right-to-left, so from the second dataframe to the first dataframe).
• The columns @@source_activity and @@target_activity contain respectively the source and target activity of the interleaving.
• The columns @@source_timestamp and @@target_timestamp contain respectively the source and target timestamp of the interleaving.
• The column @@left_index contains the index of the event of the first of the two dataframes.
• The column @@right_index contains the index of the event of the second of the two dataframes.
• The column @@timestamp_diff contains the difference between the two timestamps (can be useful to aggregate on the time).

We provide a visualization of the interleavings between the two logs. The visualization considers the DFG of the two logs and shows the interleavings between them (decorated by the frequency/performance of the relationship).

import pandas as pd
import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    dataframe1 = pd.read_csv("tests/input_data/interleavings/receipt_even.csv")
    dataframe1 = pm4py.format_dataframe(dataframe1)
    dataframe2 = pd.read_csv("tests/input_data/interleavings/receipt_odd.csv")
    dataframe2 = pm4py.format_dataframe(dataframe2)
    case_relations = pd.read_csv("tests/input_data/interleavings/case_relations.csv")

    from pm4py.algo.discovery.ocel.interleavings import algorithm as interleavings_discovery
    interleavings = interleavings_discovery.apply(dataframe1, dataframe2, case_relations)

    from pm4py.visualization.ocel.interleavings import visualizer as interleavings_visualizer

    # visualizes the frequency of the interleavings
    gviz_freq = interleavings_visualizer.apply(dataframe1, dataframe2, interleavings, parameters={"annotation": "frequency", "format": "svg"})
    interleavings_visualizer.view(gviz_freq)
                                

import pandas as pd
import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    dataframe1 = pd.read_csv("tests/input_data/interleavings/receipt_even.csv")
    dataframe1 = pm4py.format_dataframe(dataframe1)
    dataframe2 = pd.read_csv("tests/input_data/interleavings/receipt_odd.csv")
    dataframe2 = pm4py.format_dataframe(dataframe2)
    case_relations = pd.read_csv("tests/input_data/interleavings/case_relations.csv")

    from pm4py.algo.discovery.ocel.interleavings import algorithm as interleavings_discovery
    interleavings = interleavings_discovery.apply(dataframe1, dataframe2, case_relations)

    from pm4py.visualization.ocel.interleavings import visualizer as interleavings_visualizer

    # visualizes the performance of the interleavings
    gviz_perf = interleavings_visualizer.apply(dataframe1, dataframe2, interleavings, parameters={"annotation": "performance", "aggregation_measure": "median", "format": "svg"})
    interleavings_visualizer.view(gviz_perf)
                                

The parameters offered by the visualization of the interleavings follows:

• Parameters.FORMAT: the format of the visualization (svg, png).
• Parameters.BGCOLOR: background color of the visualization (default: transparent).
• Parameters.RANKDIR: the direction of visualization of the diagram (LR, TB).
• Parameters.ANNOTATION: the annotation to be used (frequency, performance).
• Parameters.AGGREGATION_MEASURE: the aggregation to be used (mean, median, min, max).
• Parameters.ACTIVITY_PERCENTAGE: the percentage of activities that shall be included in the two DFGs and the interleavings visualization.
• Parameters.PATHS_PERCENTAG: the percentage of paths that shall be included in the two DFGs and the interleavings visualization.
• Parameters.DEPENDENCY_THRESHOLD: the dependency threshold that shall be used to filter the edges of the DFG.
• Parameters.MIN_FACT_EDGES_INTERLEAVINGS: parameter that regulates the fraction of interleavings that is shown in the diagram.

Creating an OCEL out of the Interleavings

Given two logs having related cases, we saw how to calculate the interleavings between the logs.

In this section, we want to exploit the information contained in the two logs and in their interleavings to create an object-centric event log (OCEL). This will contain the events of the two event logs and the connections between them. The OCEL can be used with any object-centric process mining technique.

import pandas as pd
import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    dataframe1 = pd.read_csv("tests/input_data/interleavings/receipt_even.csv")
    dataframe1 = pm4py.format_dataframe(dataframe1)
    dataframe2 = pd.read_csv("tests/input_data/interleavings/receipt_odd.csv")
    dataframe2 = pm4py.format_dataframe(dataframe2)
    case_relations = pd.read_csv("tests/input_data/interleavings/case_relations.csv")

    from pm4py.algo.discovery.ocel.interleavings import algorithm as interleavings_discovery
    interleavings = interleavings_discovery.apply(dataframe1, dataframe2, case_relations)

    from pm4py.objects.ocel.util import log_ocel
    ocel = log_ocel.from_interleavings(dataframe1, dataframe2, interleavings)
                                

Merging Related Logs (Case Relations)

If two event logs of two inter-related process are considered, it may make sense for some analysis to merge them. The resulting log will contain cases which contain events of the first and the second event log.

This happens when popular enterprise processes such as the P2P and the O2C are considered. If a sales order is placed which require a material that is not available, a purchase order can be operated to a supplier in order to get the material and fulfill the sales order.

For the merge operation, we will need to consider:

• A reference event log (whose cases will be enriched by the events of the other event log.
• An event log to be merged (its events end up in the cases of the reference event log).
• A set of case relationships between them.

import pandas as pd
import pm4py
from pm4py.algo.merging.case_relations import algorithm as case_relations_merging
import os

if __name__ == "__main__":
    dataframe1 = pd.read_csv(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "interleavings", "receipt_even.csv"))
    dataframe1 = pm4py.format_dataframe(dataframe1)
    dataframe2 = pd.read_csv(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "interleavings", "receipt_odd.csv"))
    dataframe2 = pm4py.format_dataframe(dataframe2)
    case_relations = pd.read_csv(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "interleavings", "case_relations.csv"))
    merged = case_relations_merging.apply(dataframe1, dataframe2, case_relations)
                                

Network Analysis

The classical social network analysis methods (such as the ones described in this page at the later sections) are based on the order of the events inside a case. For example, the Handover of Work metric considers the directly-follows relationships between resources during the work of a case. An edge is added between the two resources if such relationships occurs.

Real-life scenarios may be more complicated. At first, is difficult to collect events inside the same case without having convergence/divergence issues (see first section of the OCEL part). At second, the type of relationship may also be important. Consider for example the relationship between two resources: this may be more efficient if the activity that is executed is liked by the resources, rather than disgusted.

The network analysis that we introduce in this section generalizes some existing social network analysis metrics, becoming independent from the choice of a case notion and permitting to build a multi-graph instead of a simple graph.

With this, we assume events to be linked by signals. An event emits a signal (that is contained as one attribute of the event) that is assumed to be received by other events (also, this is an attribute of these events) that follow the first event in the log. So, we assume there is an OUT attribute (of the event) that is identical to the IN attribute (of the other events).

When we collect this information, we can build the network analysis graph:

• The source node of the relation is given by an aggregation over a node_column_source attribute.
• The target node of the relation is given by an aggregation over a node_column_target attribute.
• The type of edge is given by an aggregation over an edge_column attribute.
• The network analysis graph can either be annotated with frequency or performance information.

import os
import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "receipt.xes"))

    frequency_edges = pm4py.discover_network_analysis(log, out_column="case:concept:name", in_column="case:concept:name", node_column_source="org:group", node_column_target="org:group", edge_column="concept:name", performance=False)
    pm4py.view_network_analysis(frequency_edges, variant="frequency", format="svg", edge_threshold=10)
                                

In the previous example, we have loaded one traditional event log (the receipt.xes event log), and performed the network analysis with the follows choice of parameters:

• The OUT-column is set to case:concept:name and the IN-column is set also to case:concept:name (that means, succeeding events of the same case are connected).
• The node_column_source and node_column_target attribute are set to org:group (we want to see the network of relations between different organizational groups.
• The edge_column attribute is set to concept:name (we want to see the frequency/performance of edges between groups, depending on the activity, so we can evaluate advantageous exchanges).

Note that in the previous case, we resorted to use the case identifier as OUT/IN column, but that's just a specific example (the OUT and IN columns can be different, and differ from the case identifier).

import os
import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "receipt.xes"))

    performance_edges = pm4py.discover_network_analysis(log, out_column="case:concept:name", in_column="case:concept:name", node_column_source="org:group", node_column_target="org:group", edge_column="concept:name", performance=True)
    pm4py.view_network_analysis(performance_edges, variant="performance", format="svg", edge_threshold=10)
                                

The visualization supports the following parameters:

• format: the format of the visualization (default: png).
• bgcolor: the background color of the produced picture.
• activity_threshold: the minimum number of occurrences for an activity to be included (default: 1).
• edge_threshold: the minimum number of occurrences for an edge to be included (default: 1).

Link Analysis

While the goal of the network analysis is to provide an aggregated visualization of the links between different events, the goal of link analysis is just the discovery of the links between the events, to be able to reason about them.

In the examples that follow, we are going to consider the document flow table VBFA of SAP. This table contains some properties and the connections between sales orders documents (e.g. the order document itself, the delivery documents, the invoice documents). Reasoning on the properties of the links could help to understand anomalous situations (e.g. the currency/price is changed during the order's lifecycle).

import pandas as pd
from pm4py.algo.discovery.ocel.link_analysis import algorithm as link_analysis
import os

if __name__ == "__main__":
    dataframe = pd.read_csv(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "ocel", "VBFA.zip"), compression="zip", dtype="str")
    dataframe["time:timestamp"] = dataframe["ERDAT"] + " " + dataframe["ERZET"]
    dataframe["time:timestamp"] = pd.to_datetime(dataframe["time:timestamp"], format="%Y%m%d %H%M%S")
    dataframe["RFWRT"] = dataframe["RFWRT"].astype(float)
    dataframe = link_analysis.apply(dataframe, parameters={"out_column": "VBELN", "in_column": "VBELV",
                                                           "sorting_column": "time:timestamp", "propagate": True})

                                

if __name__ == "__main__":
    df_currency = dataframe[(dataframe["WAERS_out"] != " ") & (dataframe["WAERS_in"] != " ") & (
                dataframe["WAERS_out"] != dataframe["WAERS_in"])]
    print(df_currency[["WAERS_out", "WAERS_in"]].value_counts())
                                

if __name__ == "__main__":
    df_amount = dataframe[(dataframe["RFWRT_out"] > 0) & (dataframe["RFWRT_out"] < dataframe["RFWRT_in"])]
    print(df_amount[["RFWRT_out", "RFWRT_in"]])
                                

The parameters of the link analysis algorithm are:

• Parameters.OUT_COLUMN: the column of the dataframe that is used to link the source events to the target events.
• Parameters.IN_COLUMN: the column of the dataframe that is used to link the target events to the source events.
• Parameters.SORTING_COLUMN: the attribute which is used preliminarly to sort the dataframe.
• Parameters.INDEX_COLUMN: the name of the column of the dataframe that should be used to store the incremental event index.
• Parameters.LOOK_FORWARD: merge an event e1 with an event e2 (e1.OUT = e2.IN) only if the index in the dataframe of e1 is lower than the index of the dataframe of e2.
• Parameters.KEEP_FIRST_OCCURRENCE if several events e21, e22 are such that e1.OUT = e21.IN = e22.IN, keep only the relationship between e1 and e21.
• Parameters.PROPAGATE: propagate the discovered relationships. If e1, e2, e3 are such that e1.OUT = e2.IN and e2.OUT = e3.IN, then consider e1 to be in relationship also with e3.

OC-DFG discovery

Object-centric directly-follows multigraphs are a composition of directly-follows graphs for the single object type, which can be annotated with different metrics considering the entities of an object-centric event log (i.e., events, unique objects, total objects).

We provide both the discovery of the OC-DFG (which provides a generic objects allowing for many different choices of the metrics), and the visualization of the same.

import pm4py
import os

if __name__ == "__main__":
    ocel = pm4py.read_ocel(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "ocel", "example_log.jsonocel"))
    ocdfg = pm4py.discover_ocdfg(ocel)
    # views the model with the frequency annotation
    pm4py.view_ocdfg(ocdfg, format="svg")
                                

import pm4py
import os

if __name__ == "__main__":
    ocel = pm4py.read_ocel(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "ocel", "example_log.jsonocel"))
    ocdfg = pm4py.discover_ocdfg(ocel)
    # views the model with the performance annotation
    pm4py.view_ocdfg(ocdfg, format="svg", annotation="performance", performance_aggregation="median")
                                

The visualization supports the following parameters:

• annotation: The annotation to use for the visualization. Values: frequency (the frequency annotation), performance (the performance annotation).
• act_metric: The metric to use for the activities. Available values: events (number of events), unique_objects (number of unique objects), total_objects (number of total objects).
• edge_metric: The metric to use for the edges. Available values: event_couples (number of event couples), unique_objects (number of unique objects), total_objects (number of total objects).
• act_threshold: The threshold to apply on the activities frequency (default: 0). Only activities having a frequency >= than this are kept in the graph.
• edge_threshold: The threshold to apply on the edges frequency (default 0). Only edges having a frequency >= than this are kept in the graph.
• performance_aggregation: The aggregation measure to use for the performance: mean, median, min, max, sum
• format: The format of the output visualization (default: png)

OC-PN discovery

Object-centric Petri Nets (OC-PN) are formal models, discovered on top of the object-centric event logs, using an underlying process discovery algorithm (such as the Inductive Miner). They have been described in the scientific paper:

van der Aalst, Wil MP, and Alessandro Berti. "Discovering object-centric Petri nets." Fundamenta informaticae 175.1-4 (2020): 1-40.

In pm4py, we offer a basic implementation of object-centric Petri nets (without any additional decoration).

import pm4py
import os

if __name__ == "__main__":
    ocel = pm4py.read_ocel(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "ocel", "example_log.jsonocel"))
    model = pm4py.discover_oc_petri_net(ocel)
    pm4py.view_ocpn(model, format="svg")
                                

Object Graphs on OCEL

It is possible to catch the interaction between the different objects of an OCEL in different ways. In pm4py, we offer support for the computation of some object-based graphs:

• The objects interaction graph connects two objects if they are related in some event of the log.
• The objects descendants graph connects an object, which is related to an event but does not start its lifecycle with the given event, to all the objects that start their lifecycle with the given event.
• The objects inheritance graph connects an object, which terminates its lifecycle with the given event, to all the objects that start their lifecycle with the given event.
• The objects cobirth graph connects objects which start their lifecycle within the same event.
• The objects codeath graph connects objects which complete their lifecycle within the same event.

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    ocel = pm4py.read_ocel("tests/input_data/ocel/example_log.jsonocel")
    from pm4py.algo.transformation.ocel.graphs import object_interaction_graph
    graph = object_interaction_graph.apply(ocel)
                                

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    ocel = pm4py.read_ocel("tests/input_data/ocel/example_log.jsonocel")
    from pm4py.algo.transformation.ocel.graphs import object_descendants_graph
    graph = object_descendants_graph.apply(ocel)
                                

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    ocel = pm4py.read_ocel("tests/input_data/ocel/example_log.jsonocel")
    from pm4py.algo.transformation.ocel.graphs import object_inheritance_graph
    graph = object_inheritance_graph.apply(ocel)
                                

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    ocel = pm4py.read_ocel("tests/input_data/ocel/example_log.jsonocel")
    from pm4py.algo.transformation.ocel.graphs import object_cobirth_graph
    graph = object_cobirth_graph.apply(ocel)
                                

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    ocel = pm4py.read_ocel("tests/input_data/ocel/example_log.jsonocel")
    from pm4py.algo.transformation.ocel.graphs import object_codeath_graph
    graph = object_codeath_graph.apply(ocel)
                                

Feature Extraction on OCEL - Object-Based

For machine learning purposes, we might want to create a feature matrix, which contains a row for every object of the object-centric event log.

The dimensions which can be considered for the computation of features are different:

• The lifecycle of an object (sequence of events in the log which are related to an object). From this dimension, several features, including the length of the lifecycle, the duration of the lifecycle, can be computed. Moreover, the sequence of the activities inside the lifecycle can be computed. For example, the one-hot encoding of the activities can be considered (every activity is associated to a different column, and the number of events of the lifecycle having the given activity is reported).
• Features extracted from the graphs computed on the OCEL (objects interaction graph, objects descendants graph, objects inheritance graph, objects cobirth/codeath graph). For every one of these, the number of objects connected to a given object are considered as feature.
• The number of objects having a lifecycle intersecting (on the time dimension) with the current object.
• The one-hot-encoding of a specified collection of string attributes.
• The encoding of the values of a specified collection of numeric attributes.

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    ocel = pm4py.read_ocel("tests/input_data/ocel/example_log.jsonocel")
    from pm4py.algo.transformation.ocel.features.objects import algorithm
    data, feature_names = algorithm.apply(ocel,
                                        parameters={"str_obj_attr": ["oattr1"], "num_obj_attr": ["oattr2"]})
                                

Feature Extraction on OCEL - Event-Based

For machine learning purposes, we might want to create a feature matrix, which contains a row for every event of the object-centric event log.

The dimensions which can be considered for the computation of features are different:

• The timestamp of the event. This can be encoded in different way (absolute timestamp, hour of the day, day of the week, month).
• The activity of the event. An one-hot encoding of the activity values can be performed.
• The related objects to the event. Features such as the total number of related objects, the number of related objects per type, the number of objects which start their lifecycle with the current event, the number of objects which complete their lifecycle with the current event) can be considered.
• The one-hot-encoding of a specified collection of string attributes.
• The encoding of the values of a specified collection of numeric attributes.

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    ocel = pm4py.read_ocel("tests/input_data/ocel/example_log.jsonocel")
    from pm4py.algo.transformation.ocel.features.events import algorithm
    data, feature_names = algorithm.apply(ocel,
                                        parameters={"str_obj_attr": ["prova"], "num_obj_attr": ["prova2"]})
                                

OCEL validation

The validation process permits to recognise valid JSON-OCEL/XML-OCEL files before starting the parsing. This is done against a schema which contains the basic structure that should be followed by JSON-OCEL and XML-OCEL files.

from pm4py.objects.ocel.validation import jsonocel

if __name__ == "__main__":
    validation_result = jsonocel.apply("tests/input_data/ocel/example_log.jsonocel", "tests/input_data/ocel/schema.json")
    print(validation_result)
                                

from pm4py.objects.ocel.validation import xmlocel

if __name__ == "__main__":
    validation_result = xmlocel.apply("tests/input_data/ocel/example_log.xmlocel", "tests/input_data/ocel/schema.xml")
    print(validation_result)
                                

Alpha Miner

The alpha miner is one of the most known Process Discovery algorithm and is able to find:

• A Petri net model where all the transitions are visible and unique and correspond to classified events (for example, to activities).
• An initial marking that describes the status of the Petri net model when a execution starts.
• A final marking that describes the status of the Petri net model when a execution ends.

We provide an example where a log is read, the Alpha algorithm is applied and the Petri net along with the initial and the final marking are found. The log we take as input is the running-example.xes.

import os
import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes(os.path.join("tests","input_data","running-example.xes"))

if __name__ == "__main__":
    net, initial_marking, final_marking = pm4py.discover_petri_net_alpha(log)

Inductive Miner

In pm4py, we offer an implementation of the inductive miner (IM), of the inductive miner infrequent (IMf), and of the inductive miner directly-follows (IMd) algorithm. The papers describing the approaches are the following:

• Inductive Miner: Discovering block-structured process models from event logs-a constructive approach
• Inductive Miner infrequent: Discovering block-structured process models from event logs containing infrequent behaviour
• Inductive Miner directly-follows Scalable process discovery with guarantees

The basic idea of Inductive Miner is about detecting a 'cut' in the log (e.g. sequential cut, parallel cut, concurrent cut and loop cut) and then recur on sublogs, which were found applying the cut, until a base case is found. The Directly-Follows variant avoids the recursion on the sublogs but uses the Directly Follows graph.

Inductive miner models usually make extensive use of hidden transitions, especially for skipping/looping on a portion on the model. Furthermore, each visible transition has a unique label (there are no transitions in the model that share the same label).

Two process models can be derived: Petri Net and Process Tree.

import os
import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes(os.path.join("tests","input_data","running-example.xes"))
    net, initial_marking, final_marking = pm4py.discover_petri_net_inductive(log)

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    tree = pm4py.discover_process_tree_inductive(log)

    pm4py.view_process_tree(tree)

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    net, initial_marking, final_marking = pm4py.convert_to_petri_net(tree)

Heuristic Miner

Heuristics Miner is an algorithm that acts on the Directly-Follows Graph, providing way to handle with noise and to find common constructs (dependency between two activities, AND). The output of the Heuristics Miner is an Heuristics Net, so an object that contains the activities and the relationships between them. The Heuristics Net can be then converted into a Petri net. The paper can be visited by clicking on the upcoming link: this link).

It is possible to obtain a Heuristic Net and a Petri Net.

import pm4py
import os

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log_path = os.path.join("tests", "compressed_input_data", "08_receipt.xes.gz")
    log = pm4py.read_xes(log_path)

    heu_net = pm4py.discover_heuristics_net(log, dependency_threshold=0.99)

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    pm4py.view_heuristics_net(heu_net)
                                

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    net, im, fm = pm4py.discover_petri_net_heuristics(log, dependency_threshold=0.99)

    pm4py.view_petri_net(net, im, fm)

Directly-Follows Graph

Process models modeled using Petri nets have a well-defined semantic: a process execution starts from the places included in the initial marking and finishes at the places included in the final marking. In this section, another class of process models, Directly-Follows Graphs, are introduced. Directly-Follows graphs are graphs where the nodes represent the events/activities in the log and directed edges are present between nodes if there is at least a trace in the log where the source event/activity is followed by the target event/activity. On top of these directed edges, it is easy to represent metrics like frequency (counting the number of times the source event/activity is followed by the target event/activity) and performance (some aggregation, for example, the mean, of time inter-lapsed between the two events/activities).

import os
import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes(os.path.join("tests","input_data","running-example.xes"))
    dfg, start_activities, end_activities = pm4py.discover_dfg(log)
    pm4py.view_dfg(dfg, start_activities, end_activities)

import os
import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes(os.path.join("tests","input_data","running-example.xes"))
    performance_dfg, start_activities, end_activities = pm4py.discover_performance_dfg(log)
    pm4py.view_performance_dfg(performance_dfg, start_activities, end_activities)

import os
import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes(os.path.join("tests","input_data","running-example.xes"))
    performance_dfg, start_activities, end_activities = pm4py.discover_performance_dfg(log)
    pm4py.save_vis_performance_dfg(performance_dfg, start_activities, end_activities, 'perf_dfg.svg')
                                

Adding information about Frequency/Performance

Similar to the Directly-Follows graph, it is also possible to decorate the Petri net with frequency or performance information. This is done by using a replay technique on the model and then assigning frequency/performance to the paths. The variant parameter of the visualizer specifies which annotation should be used. The values for the variant parameter are the following:

• pn_visualizer.Variants.WO_DECORATION: This is the default value and indicates that the Petri net is not decorated.
• pn_visualizer.Variants.FREQUENCY: This indicates that the model should be decorated according to frequency information obtained by applying replay.
• pn_visualizer.Variants.PERFORMANCE: This indicates that the model should be decorated according to performance (aggregated by mean) information obtained by applying replay.

In the case the frequency and performance decoration are chosen, it is required to pass the log as a parameter of the visualization (it needs to be replayed).

from pm4py.visualization.petri_net import visualizer as pn_visualizer

if __name__ == "__main__":
    parameters = {pn_visualizer.Variants.FREQUENCY.value.Parameters.FORMAT: "png"}
    gviz = pn_visualizer.apply(net, initial_marking, final_marking, parameters=parameters, variant=pn_visualizer.Variants.FREQUENCY, log=log)
    pn_visualizer.save(gviz, "inductive_frequency.png")

Correlation Miner

In Process Mining, we are used to have logs containing at least:

• A case identifier
• An activity
• A timestamp

The case identifier associates an event, happening to a system, to a particular execution of the process. This permits to apply algorithms such as process discovery, conformance checking, …

However, in some systems (for example, the data collected from IoT systems), it may be difficult to associate a case identifier. On top of these logs, performing classic process mining is impossible. Correlation mining borns as a response to the challenge to extract a process model from such event logs, that permits to read useful information that is contained in the logs without a case identifier, that contains only:

• An activity column
• A timestamp column

In this description, we assume there is a total order on events (that means that no events happen in the same timestamp). Situations where a total order is not defined are more complicated.

The Correlation Miner is an approach proposed in:

Pourmirza, Shaya, Remco Dijkman, and Paul Grefen. “Correlation miner: mining business process models and event correlations without case identifiers.” International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 26.02 (2017): 1742002.

That aims to resolve this problem by resolving an (integer) linear problem defined on top of:

• The P/S matrix: expressing the relationship of order between the activities as recorded in the log.
• The Duration matrix: expressing an aggregation of the duration between two activities, obtained by solving an optimization problem

The solution of this problem provides a set of couples of activities that are, according to the approach, in directly-follows relationship, along with the strength of the relationship. This is the “frequency” DFG.

A “performance” DFG can be obtained by the duration matrix, keeping only the entries that appear in the solution of the problem (i.e., the couples of activities that appear in the “frequency” DFG).

This can be then visualized (using for example the pm4py DFG visualization).

To have a “realistic” example (for which we know the “real” DFG), we can take an existing log and simply remove the case ID column, trying then to reconstruct the DFG without having that.

import pandas as pd
import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    df = pd.read_csv(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "receipt.csv"))
    df = pm4py.format_dataframe(df)
    df = df[["concept:name", "time:timestamp"]]
                                

from pm4py.algo.discovery.correlation_mining import algorithm as correlation_miner

if __name__ == "__main__":
    frequency_dfg, performance_dfg = correlation_miner.apply(df, parameters={"pm4py:param:activity_key": "concept:name",
                                    "pm4py:param:timestamp_key": "time:timestamp"})
                                

if __name__ == "__main__":
    activities_freq = dict(df["concept:name"].value_counts())
                                

from pm4py.visualization.dfg import visualizer as dfg_visualizer

if __name__ == "__main__":
    gviz_freq = dfg_visualizer.apply(frequency_dfg, variant=dfg_visualizer.Variants.FREQUENCY, activities_count=activities_freq, parameters={"format": "svg"})
    gviz_perf = dfg_visualizer.apply(performance_dfg, variant=dfg_visualizer.Variants.PERFORMANCE, activities_count=activities_freq, parameters={"format": "svg"})
    dfg_visualizer.view(gviz_freq)
    dfg_visualizer.view(gviz_perf)
                                

Visualizing the DFGs, we can say that the correlation miner was able to discover a visualization where the main path is clear. Different variants of the correlation miner are available:

Temporal Profile

We propose in pm4py an implementation of the temporal profile model. This has been described in:

Stertz, Florian, Jürgen Mangler, and Stefanie Rinderle-Ma. "Temporal Conformance Checking at Runtime based on Time-infused Process Models." arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.07262 (2020).

A temporal profile measures for every couple of activities in the log the average time and the standard deviation between events having the provided activities. The time is measured between the completion of the first event and the start of the second event. Hence, it is assumed to work with an interval log where the events have two timestamps. The output of the temporal profile discovery is a dictionary where each couple of activities (expressed as a tuple) is associated to a couple of numbers, the first is the average and the second is the average standard deviation.

We provide an example of discovery for the temporal profile.

import pm4py
from pm4py.algo.discovery.temporal_profile import algorithm as temporal_profile_discovery

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes("tests/input_data/running-example.xes")
    temporal_profile = temporal_profile_discovery.apply(log)
                                

Some parameters can be used in order to customize the execution of the temporal profile:

Importing and exporting

Petri nets, along with their initial and final marking, can be imported/exported from the PNML file format. The code on the right-hand side can be used to import a Petri net along with the initial and final marking.

import os
import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    net, initial_marking, final_marking = pm4py.read_pnml(os.path.join("tests","input_data","running-example.pnml"))
    pm4py.view_petri_net(net, initial_marking, final_marking)

    pm4py.write_pnml(net, initial_marking, final_marking, "petri.pnml")

Petri Net properties

This section is about how to get the properties of a Petri Net. A property of the pet is, for example, a the enabled transition in a particular marking. However, also a list of places, transitions or arcs can be inspected.

from pm4py.objects.petri_net import semantics

if __name__ == "__main__":
    transitions = semantics.enabled_transitions(net, initial_marking)

if __name__ == "__main__":
    places = net.places
    transitions = net.transitions
    arcs = net.arcs

if __name__ == "__main__":
    for place in places:
     print("\nPLACE: "+place.name)
     for arc in place.in_arcs:
      print(arc.source.name, arc.source.label)

Creating a new Petri Net

In this section, an overview of the code necessary to create a new Petri net with places, transitions, and arcs is provided. A Petri net object in pm4py should be created with a name.

# creating an empty Petri net
from pm4py.objects.petri_net.obj import PetriNet, Marking

if __name__ == "__main__":
    net = PetriNet("new_petri_net")

if __name__ == "__main__":
    # creating source, p_1 and sink place
    source = PetriNet.Place("source")
    sink = PetriNet.Place("sink")
    p_1 = PetriNet.Place("p_1")
    # add the places to the Petri Net
    net.places.add(source)
    net.places.add(sink)
    net.places.add(p_1)

if __name__ == "__main__":
    # Create transitions
    t_1 = PetriNet.Transition("name_1", "label_1")
    t_2 = PetriNet.Transition("name_2", "label_2")
    # Add the transitions to the Petri Net
    net.transitions.add(t_1)
    net.transitions.add(t_2)

# Add arcs
if __name__ == "__main__":
    from pm4py.objects.petri_net.utils import petri_utils
    petri_utils.add_arc_from_to(source, t_1, net)
    petri_utils.add_arc_from_to(t_1, p_1, net)
    petri_utils.add_arc_from_to(p_1, t_2, net)
    petri_utils.add_arc_from_to(t_2, sink, net)

# Adding tokens
if __name__ == "__main__":
    initial_marking = Marking()
    initial_marking[source] = 1
    final_marking = Marking()
    final_marking[sink] = 1

import pm4py
if __name__ == "__main__":
    pm4py.write_pnml(net, initial_marking, final_marking, "createdPetriNet1.pnml")

    pm4py.view_petri_net(net, initial_marking, final_marking)

import pm4py
if __name__ == "__main__":
    pm4py.view_petri_net(net, initial_marking, final_marking, format="svg")
    pm4py.save_vis_petri_net(net, initial_marking, final_marking, "net.svg")

Maximal Decomposition

The decomposition technique proposed in this section is useful for conformance checking purpose. Indeed, splitting the overall model in smaller models can reduce the size of the state space, hence increasing the performance of the conformance checking operation. We propose to use the decomposition technique (maximal decomposition of a Petri net) described in:

Van der Aalst, Wil MP. “Decomposing Petri nets for process mining: A generic approach.” Distributed and Parallel Databases 31.4 (2013): 471-507.

We can see an example of maximal decomposition on top of the Petri net extracted by the Alpha Miner on top of the Running Example log.

import os
import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "running-example.xes"))
    net, im, fm = pm4py.discover_petri_net_alpha(log)
                                

from pm4py.objects.petri_net.utils.decomposition import decompose

if __name__ == "__main__":
    list_nets = decompose(net, im, fm)
                                

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    for index, model in enumerate(list_nets):
        subnet, s_im, s_fm = model

        pm4py.save_vis_petri_net(subnet, s_im, s_fm, str(index)+".png")
                                

A log that is fit according to the original model is also fit (projecting on the activities of the net) for these nets. Conversely, any deviation on top of these models represent a deviation also on the original model.

Reachability Graph

A reachability graph is a transition system that can constructed on any Petri net along with an initial marking, and is the graph of all the markings of the Petri net. These markings are connected by as many edges as many transitions connect the two different markings.

The main goal of the reachability graph is to provide an understanding of the state space of the Petri net. Usually, Petri nets containing a lot of concurrency have an incredibly big reachability graph. The same computation of the reachability graph may be unfeasible for such models.

from pm4py.objects.petri_net.utils import reachability_graph

if __name__ == "__main__":
    ts = reachability_graph.construct_reachability_graph(net, im)
                                

from pm4py.visualization.transition_system import visualizer as ts_visualizer

if __name__ == "__main__":
    gviz = ts_visualizer.apply(ts, parameters={ts_visualizer.Variants.VIEW_BASED.value.Parameters.FORMAT: "svg"})
    ts_visualizer.view(gviz)
                                

Petri Nets with Reset / Inhibitor arcs

The support to Petri nets with reset / inhibitor arcs is provided through the arctype property of a PetriNet.Arc object. In particular, the arctype property could assume two different values:

• inhibitor: defines an inhibitor arc. An inhibitor arcs blocks the firing of all the transitions to which is connected, assuming that there is one token in the source place.
• reset: defines a reset arc. A reset arc sucks all the tokens from its source place whenever the target transition is fired.

The corresponding semantic, that is identical in signature to the classic semantics of Petri nets, is defined in pm4py.objects.petri_net.inhibitor_reset.semantics.

Data Petri nets

Data Petri nets include the execution context in the marking object, in such way that the execution of a transition may depend on the value of this execution context, and not only on the tokens. Data Petri nets are defined extensively in the following scientific contribution:

Mannhardt, Felix, et al. "Balanced multi-perspective checking of process conformance." Computing 98.4 (2016): 407-437.

The semantics of a data Petri net requires the specification of the execution context (as dictionary associating to attribute keys some values), and is defined in pm4py.objects.petri_net.data_petri_nets.semantics. In particular, the following methods require the execution context:

• semantics.enabled_transitions(pn, m, e): checks the enabled transitions in the provided Petri net pn and marking m when the execution context is updated with the information coming from the current event.
• semantics.execute(t, pn, m, e): executes (whether possible) the transition t in the marking m where the execution context is updated with the information coming from the current event.

Token-based replay

Token-based replay matches a trace and a Petri net model, starting from the initial place, in order to discover which transitions are executed and in which places we have remaining or missing tokens for the given process instance. Token-based replay is useful for Conformance Checking: indeed, a trace is fitting according to the model if, during its execution, the transitions can be fired without the need to insert any missing token. If the reaching of the final marking is imposed, then a trace is fitting if it reaches the final marking without any missing or remaining tokens.

In pm4py there is an implementation of a token replayer that is able to go across hidden transitions (calculating shortest paths between places) and can be used with any Petri net model with unique visible transitions and hidden transitions. When a visible transition needs to be fired and not all places in the preset are provided with the correct number of tokens, starting from the current marking it is checked if for some place there is a sequence of hidden transitions that could be fired in order to enable the visible transition. The hidden transitions are then fired and a marking that permits to enable the visible transition is reached.

import os
import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "running-example.xes"))

    net, initial_marking, final_marking = pm4py.discover_petri_net_alpha(log)

    replayed_traces = pm4py.conformance_diagnostics_token_based_replay(log, net, initial_marking, final_marking)

Diagnostics (TBR)

The execution of token-based replay in pm4py permits to obtain detailed information about transitions that did not execute correctly, or activities that are in the log and not in the model. In particular, executions that do not match the model are expected to take longer throughput time.

The diagnostics that are provided by pm4py are the following:

• Throughput analysis on the transitions that are executed in an unfit way according to the process model (the Petri net).
• Throughput analysis on the activities that are not contained in the model.
• Root Cause Analysis on the causes that lead to an unfit execution of the transitions.
• Root Cause Analysis on the causes that lead to executing activities that are not contained in the process model.

import os
import pm4py
if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "receipt.xes"))
    log = pm4py.convert_to_event_log(log)
                                

import pm4py
if __name__ == "__main__":
    filtered_log = pm4py.filter_variants_top_k(log, 3)
                                

import pm4py
if __name__ == "__main__":
    net, initial_marking, final_marking = pm4py.discover_petri_net_inductive(filtered_log)
                                

from pm4py.algo.conformance.tokenreplay import algorithm as token_based_replay
if __name__ == "__main__":
    parameters_tbr = {token_based_replay.Variants.TOKEN_REPLAY.value.Parameters.DISABLE_VARIANTS: True, token_based_replay.Variants.TOKEN_REPLAY.value.Parameters.ENABLE_PLTR_FITNESS: True}
    replayed_traces, place_fitness, trans_fitness, unwanted_activities = token_based_replay.apply(log, net,
                                                                                                  initial_marking,
                                                                                                  final_marking,
                                                                                                  parameters=parameters_tbr)
                                

Then, we pass to diagnostics information.

Throughput analysis (unfit execution)

from pm4py.algo.conformance.tokenreplay.diagnostics import duration_diagnostics
if __name__ == "__main__":
    trans_diagnostics = duration_diagnostics.diagnose_from_trans_fitness(log, trans_fitness)
    for trans in trans_diagnostics:
        print(trans, trans_diagnostics[trans])
                                

Obtaining an output where is clear that unfit executions lead to much higher throughput times (from 126 to 146 times higher throughput time).

Throughput analysis (activities)

from pm4py.algo.conformance.tokenreplay.diagnostics import duration_diagnostics
if __name__ == "__main__":
    act_diagnostics = duration_diagnostics.diagnose_from_notexisting_activities(log, unwanted_activities)
    for act in act_diagnostics:
        print(act, act_diagnostics[act])
                                

Root Cause Analysis

The output of root cause analysis in the diagnostics context is a decision tree that permits to understand the causes of a deviation. In the following examples, for each deviation, a different decision tree is built and visualized.

if __name__ == "__main__":
    # build decision trees
    string_attributes = ["org:group"]
    numeric_attributes = []
    parameters = {"string_attributes": string_attributes, "numeric_attributes": numeric_attributes}
                                

Root Cause Analysis (unfit execution)

from pm4py.algo.conformance.tokenreplay.diagnostics import root_cause_analysis
if __name__ == "__main__":
    trans_root_cause = root_cause_analysis.diagnose_from_trans_fitness(log, trans_fitness, parameters=parameters)
                                

from pm4py.visualization.decisiontree import visualizer as dt_vis

if __name__ == "__main__":
    for trans in trans_root_cause:
        clf = trans_root_cause[trans]["clf"]
        feature_names = trans_root_cause[trans]["feature_names"]
        classes = trans_root_cause[trans]["classes"]
        # visualization could be called
        gviz = dt_vis.apply(clf, feature_names, classes)
        dt_vis.view(gviz)
                                

Root Cause Analysis (activities that are not in the model)

from pm4py.algo.conformance.tokenreplay.diagnostics import root_cause_analysis
if __name__ == "__main__":
    act_root_cause = root_cause_analysis.diagnose_from_notexisting_activities(log, unwanted_activities,
                                                                              parameters=parameters)
                                

from pm4py.visualization.decisiontree import visualizer as dt_vis
if __name__ == "__main__":
    for act in act_root_cause:
        clf = act_root_cause[act]["clf"]
        feature_names = act_root_cause[act]["feature_names"]
        classes = act_root_cause[act]["classes"]
        # visualization could be called
        gviz = dt_vis.apply(clf, feature_names, classes)
        dt_vis.view(gviz)
                                

Alignments

pm4py comes with the following set of linear solvers: Scipy (available for any platform), CVXOPT (available for the most widely used platforms including Windows/Linux). Alternatively, ORTools can also be used and installed from PIP.

Alignment-based replay aims to find one of the best alignment between the trace and the model. For each trace, the output of an alignment is a list of couples where the first element is an event (of the trace) or » and the second element is a transition (of the model) or ». For each couple, the following classification could be provided:

• Sync move: the classification of the event corresponds to the transition label; in this case, both the trace and the model advance in the same way during the replay.
• Move on log: for couples where the second element is », it corresponds to a replay move in the trace that is not mimicked in the model. This kind of move is unfit and signal a deviation between the trace and the model.
• Move on model: for couples where the first element is », it corresponds to a replay move in the model that is not mimicked in the trace. For moves on model, we can have the following distinction:
  • Moves on model involving hidden transitions: in this case, even if it is not a sync move, the move is fit.
  • Moves on model not involving hidden transitions: in this case, the move is unfit and signals a deviation between the trace and the model.

import os
import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "running-example.xes"))
    log = pm4py.convert_to_event_log(log)

    net, initial_marking, final_marking = pm4py.discover_petri_net_inductive(log)

    import pm4py
    aligned_traces = pm4py.conformance_diagnostics_alignments(log, net, initial_marking, final_marking)

print(alignments)

if __name__ == "__main__":
    for trace in log:
     for event in trace:
      event["customClassifier"] = event["concept:name"] + event["concept:name"]

# define the activity key in the parameters
from pm4py.algo.discovery.inductive import algorithm as inductive_miner
from pm4py.algo.conformance.alignments.petri_net import algorithm as alignments
from pm4py.objects.conversion.process_tree import converter as process_tree_converter
parameters = {"pm4py:param:activity_key": "customClassifier"}

# calculate process model using the given classifier
if __name__ == "__main__":
    process_tree = inductive_miner.apply(log, parameters=parameters)
    net, initial_marking, final_marking = process_tree_converter.apply(process_tree)
    aligned_traces = alignments.apply_log(log, net, initial_marking, final_marking, parameters=parameters)

    from pm4py.algo.evaluation.replay_fitness import algorithm as replay_fitness
    log_fitness = replay_fitness.evaluate(aligned_traces, variant=replay_fitness.Variants.ALIGNMENT_BASED)

    print(log_fitness)

It is also possible to select other parameters for the alignments.

• Model cost function: associating to each transition in the Petri net the corresponding cost of a move-on-model.
• Sync cost function: associating to each visible transition in the Petri net the cost of a sync move.

if __name__ == "__main__":
    model_cost_function = dict()
    sync_cost_function = dict()
    for t in net.transitions:
     # if the label is not None, we have a visible transition
     if t.label is not None:
      # associate cost 1000 to each move-on-model associated to visible transitions
      model_cost_function[t] = 1000
      # associate cost 0 to each move-on-log
      sync_cost_function[t] = 0
     else:
      # associate cost 1 to each move-on-model associated to hidden transitions
      model_cost_function[t] = 1

    parameters = {}
    parameters[alignments.Variants.VERSION_STATE_EQUATION_A_STAR.value.Parameters.PARAM_MODEL_COST_FUNCTION] = model_cost_function
    parameters[alignments.Variants.VERSION_STATE_EQUATION_A_STAR.value.Parameters.PARAM_SYNC_COST_FUNCTION] = sync_cost_function

    aligned_traces = alignments.apply_log(log, net, initial_marking, final_marking, parameters=parameters)

Decomposition of Alignments

Alignments represent a computationally expensive problem on models that contain a lot of concurrency. Yet, they are the conformance checking technique that provides the best results in term of finding a match between the process execution(s) and the model. To overcome the difficulties related to the size of the state space, various attempts to decompose the model into “smaller” pieces, into which the alignment is easier and still permit to diagnose problems, have been done.

We have seen how to obtain a maximal decomposition of the Petri net model. Now we can see how to perform the decomposition of alignments (that is based on a maximal decomposition of the Petri net model). The approach described here has been published in:

Lee, Wai Lam Jonathan, et al. “Recomposing conformance: Closing the circle on decomposed alignment-based conformance checking in process mining.” Information Sciences 466 (2018): 55-91.

The recomposition permits to understand whether each step of the process has been executed in a sync way or some deviations happened. First, an alignment is performed on top of the decomposed Petri nets.

Then, the agreement between the activities at the border is checked. If a disagreement is found, the two components that are disagreeing are merged and the alignment is repeated on them.

When the steps are agreeing between the different alignments of the components, these can be merged in a single alignment. The order of recomposition is based on the Petri net graph. Despite that, in the case of concurrency, the “recomposed” alignment contains a valid list of moves that may not be in the correct order.

from pm4py.algo.conformance.alignments.decomposed import algorithm as decomp_alignments

if __name__ == "__main__":
    conf = decomp_alignments.apply(log, net, initial_marking, final_marking, parameters={decomp_alignments.Variants.RECOMPOS_MAXIMAL.value.Parameters.PARAM_THRESHOLD_BORDER_AGREEMENT: 2})

Since decomposed models are expected to have less concurrency, the components are aligned using a Dijkstra approach. In the case of border disagreements, this can degrade the performance of the algorithm.

It should be noted that this is not an approximation technique; according to the authors, it should provide the same fitness as the original alignments.

from pm4py.algo.evaluation.replay_fitness import algorithm as rp_fitness_evaluator

if __name__ == "__main__":
    fitness = rp_fitness_evaluator.evaluate(conf, variant=rp_fitness_evaluator.Variants.ALIGNMENT_BASED)
                                

Footprints

Footprints are a very basic (but scalable) conformance checking technique to compare entities (such that event logs, DFGs, Petri nets, process trees, any other kind of model). Essentially, a relationship between any couple of activities of the log/model is inferred. This can include:

• Directly-Follows Relationships: in the log/model, it is possible that the activity A is directly followed by B.
• Directly-Before Relationships: in the log/model, it is possible that the activity B is directly preceded by A.
• Parallel behavior: it is possible that A is followed by B and B is followed by A

A footprints matrix can be calculated, that describes for each couple of activities the footprint relationship. It is possible to calculate that for different types of models and for the entire event log, but also trace-by-trace (if the local behavior is important).

import pm4py
import os
if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "running-example.xes"))

if __name__ == "__main__":
    net, im, fm = pm4py.discover_petri_net_inductive(log)

from pm4py.algo.discovery.footprints import algorithm as footprints_discovery

if __name__ == "__main__":
    fp_log = footprints_discovery.apply(log, variant=footprints_discovery.Variants.ENTIRE_EVENT_LOG)

The footprints of the entire log are:

{‘sequence’: {(‘examine casually’, ‘decide’), (‘decide’, ‘pay compensation’), (‘register request’, ‘examine thoroughly’), (‘reinitiate request’, ‘examine casually’), (‘check ticket’, ‘decide’), (‘register request’, ‘examine casually’), (‘reinitiate request’, ‘examine thoroughly’), (‘decide’, ‘reject request’), (‘examine thoroughly’, ‘decide’), (‘reinitiate request’, ‘check ticket’), (‘register request’, ‘check ticket’), (‘decide’, ‘reinitiate request’)}, ‘parallel’: {(‘examine casually’, ‘check ticket’), (‘check ticket’, ‘examine casually’), (‘check ticket’, ‘examine thoroughly’), (‘examine thoroughly’, ‘check ticket’)}, ‘start_activities’: {‘register request’}, ‘end_activities’: {‘pay compensation’, ‘reject request’}, ‘activities’: {‘reject request’, ‘register request’, ‘check ticket’, ‘decide’, ‘pay compensation’, ‘examine thoroughly’, ‘examine casually’, ‘reinitiate request’}}

The data structure is a dictionary with, as keys, sequence (expressing directly-follows relationships) and parallel (expressing the parallel behavior that can happen in either way).

from pm4py.algo.discovery.footprints import algorithm as footprints_discovery

if __name__ == "__main__":
    fp_trace_by_trace = footprints_discovery.apply(log, variant=footprints_discovery.Variants.TRACE_BY_TRACE)

if __name__ == "__main__":
    fp_net = footprints_discovery.apply(net, im, fm)

And are the following:

{‘sequence’: {(‘check ticket’, ‘decide’), (‘reinitiate request’, ‘examine casually’), (‘register request’, ‘examine thoroughly’), (‘decide’, ‘reject request’), (‘register request’, ‘check ticket’), (‘register request’, ‘examine casually’), (‘decide’, ‘reinitiate request’), (‘reinitiate request’, ‘examine thoroughly’), (‘decide’, ‘pay compensation’), (‘reinitiate request’, ‘check ticket’), (‘examine casually’, ‘decide’), (‘examine thoroughly’, ‘decide’)}, ‘parallel’: {(‘check ticket’, ‘examine thoroughly’), (‘examine thoroughly’, ‘check ticket’), (‘check ticket’, ‘examine casually’), (‘examine casually’, ‘check ticket’)}, ‘activities’: {‘decide’, ‘examine casually’, ‘reinitiate request’, ‘check ticket’, ‘examine thoroughly’, ‘register request’, ‘reject request’, ‘pay compensation’}, ‘start_activities’: {‘register request’}}

The data structure is a dictionary with, as keys, sequence (expressing directly-follows relationships) and parallel (expressing the parallel behavior that can happen in either way).

It is possible to visualize a comparison between the footprints of the (entire) log and the footprints of the (entire) model.

from pm4py.visualization.footprints import visualizer as fp_visualizer

if __name__ == "__main__":
    gviz = fp_visualizer.apply(fp_net, parameters={fp_visualizer.Variants.SINGLE.value.Parameters.FORMAT: "svg"})
    fp_visualizer.view(gviz)

from pm4py.visualization.footprints import visualizer as fp_visualizer

if __name__ == "__main__":
    gviz = fp_visualizer.apply(fp_log, fp_net, parameters={fp_visualizer.Variants.COMPARISON.value.Parameters.FORMAT: "svg"})
    fp_visualizer.view(gviz)

import pm4py
import os
from copy import deepcopy

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "receipt.xes"))
    filtered_log = pm4py.filter_variants_top_k(log, 3)

    net, im, fm = pm4py.discover_petri_net_inductive(filtered_log)

if __name__ == "__main__":
    conf_fp = pm4py.conformance_diagnostics_footprints(fp_trace_by_trace, fp_net)

And will contain, for each trace of the log, a set with the deviations. Extract of the list for some traces:

{(‘T06 Determine necessity of stop advice’, ‘T04 Determine confirmation of receipt’), (‘T02 Check confirmation of receipt’, ‘T06 Determine necessity of stop advice’)}
set()
{(‘T19 Determine report Y to stop indication’, ‘T20 Print report Y to stop indication’), (‘T10 Determine necessity to stop indication’, ‘T16 Report reasons to hold request’), (‘T16 Report reasons to hold request’, ‘T17 Check report Y to stop indication’), (‘T17 Check report Y to stop indication’, ‘T19 Determine report Y to stop indication’)}
set()
set()
{(‘T02 Check confirmation of receipt’, ‘T06 Determine necessity of stop advice’), (‘T10 Determine necessity to stop indication’, ‘T04 Determine confirmation of receipt’), (‘T04 Determine confirmation of receipt’, ‘T03 Adjust confirmation of receipt’), (‘T03 Adjust confirmation of receipt’, ‘T02 Check confirmation of receipt’)}
set()

We can see that for the first trace that contains deviations, there are two deviations, the first related to T06 Determine necessity of stop advice being executed before T04 Determine confirmation of receipt; the second related to T02 Check confirmation of receipt being followed by T06 Determine necessity of stop advice.

The traces for which the conformance returns nothing are fit (at least according to the footprints).

Footprints conformance checking is a way to identify obvious deviations, behavior of the log that is not allowed by the model.

On the log side, their scalability is wonderful! The calculation of footprints for a Petri net model may be instead more expensive.

If we change the underlying model, from Petri nets to process tree, it is possible to exploit its bottomup structure in order to calculate the footprints almost instantaneously.

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes("tests/input_data/running-example.xes")

if __name__ == "__main__":
    tree = pm4py.discover_process_tree_inductive(log)

from pm4py.algo.discovery.footprints import algorithm as fp_discovery

if __name__ == "__main__":
    fp_log = fp_discovery.apply(log, variant=fp_discovery.Variants.ENTIRE_EVENT_LOG)
    fp_trace_trace = fp_discovery.apply(log, variant=fp_discovery.Variants.TRACE_BY_TRACE)
    fp_tree = fp_discovery.apply(tree, variant=fp_discovery.Variants.PROCESS_TREE)

Each one of these contains:

• A list of sequential footprints contained in the log/allowed by the model
• A list of parallel footprints contained in the log/allowed by the model
• A list of activities contained in the log/allowed by the model
• A list of start activities contained in the log/allowed by the model
• A list of end activities contained in the log/allowed by the model

from pm4py.algo.conformance.footprints import algorithm as fp_conformance

if __name__ == "__main__":
    conf_result = fp_conformance.apply(fp_log, fp_tree, variant=fp_conformance.Variants.LOG_EXTENSIVE)

The result contains, for each item of the previous list, the violations.

from pm4py.algo.conformance.footprints.util import evaluation

if __name__ == "__main__":
    fitness = evaluation.fp_fitness(fp_log, fp_tree, conf_result)
    precision = evaluation.fp_precision(fp_log, fp_tree)

These values are both included in the interval [0,1]

Log Skeleton

The concept of log skeleton has been described in the contribution

Verbeek, H. M. W., and R. Medeiros de Carvalho. “Log skeletons: A classification approach to process discovery.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.08247 (2018).

And is claimingly the most accurate classification approach to decide whether a trace belongs to (the language) of a log or not.

For a log, an object containing a list of relations is calculated.
Inspect relations

It is also possible to provide a noise threshold. In that case, more relations are found since the conditions are relaxed.

import pm4py
import os
if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "running-example.xes"))

from pm4py.algo.discovery.log_skeleton import algorithm as lsk_discovery
if __name__ == "__main__":
    skeleton = lsk_discovery.apply(log, parameters={lsk_discovery.Variants.CLASSIC.value.Parameters.NOISE_THRESHOLD: 0.0})

We can also print that:

{‘equivalence’: {(‘pay compensation’, ‘register request’), (‘examine thoroughly’, ‘register request’), (‘reject request’, ‘register request’), (‘pay compensation’, ‘examine casually’)}, ‘always_after’: {(‘register request’, ‘check ticket’), (‘examine thoroughly’, ‘decide’), (‘register request’, ‘decide’)}, ‘always_before’: {(‘pay compensation’, ‘register request’), (‘pay compensation’, ‘decide’), (‘pay compensation’, ‘check ticket’), (‘reject request’, ‘decide’), (‘pay compensation’, ‘examine casually’), (‘reject request’, ‘check ticket’), (‘examine thoroughly’, ‘register request’), (‘reject request’, ‘register request’)}, ‘never_together’: {(‘pay compensation’, ‘reject request’), (‘reject request’, ‘pay compensation’)}, ‘directly_follows’: set(), ‘activ_freq’: {‘register request’: {1}, ‘examine casually’: {0, 1, 3}, ‘check ticket’: {1, 2, 3}, ‘decide’: {1, 2, 3}, ‘reinitiate request’: {0, 1, 2}, ‘examine thoroughly’: {0, 1}, ‘pay compensation’: {0, 1}, ‘reject request’: {0, 1}}}

We can see the relations (equivalence, always_after, always_before, never_together, directly_follows, activ_freq) as key of the object, and the values are the activities/couples of activities that follow such pattern.

import pm4py
import os
if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "receipt.xes"))
    from copy import deepcopy
    filtered_log = pm4py.filter_variants_top_k(log, 3)

from pm4py.algo.conformance.log_skeleton import algorithm as lsk_conformance
if __name__ == "__main__":
    conf_result = lsk_conformance.apply(log, skeleton)

In such way, we can get for each trace whether it has been classified as belonging to the filtered log, or not. When deviations are found, the trace does not belong to the language of the original log.

from pm4py.algo.discovery.log_skeleton import algorithm as lsk_discovery
from pm4py.algo.conformance.log_skeleton import algorithm as lsk_conformance

if __name__ == "__main__":
    skeleton = lsk_discovery.apply(log, parameters={lsk_discovery.Variants.CLASSIC.value.Parameters.NOISE_THRESHOLD: 0.03})

    conf_result = lsk_conformance.apply(log, skeleton)

We can see that some traces are classified as uncorrect also calculating the log skeleton on the original log, if a noise threshold is provided.

Alignments between Logs

In some situations, performing an optimal alignment between an event log and a process model might be unfeasible. Hence, getting an approximated alignment that highlights the main points of deviation is an option. In pm4py, we offer support for alignments between two event logs. Such alignment operation is based on the edit distance, i.e., for a trace of the first log, the trace of the second log which has the least edit distance is found. In the following example, we see how to perform alignments between an event log and the simulated log obtained by performing a playout operation on the process model.

import pm4py
if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes("tests/input_data/running-example.xes")
    net, im, fm = pm4py.discover_petri_net_inductive(log)

if __name__ == "__main__":
    simulated_log = pm4py.play_out(net, im, fm)

from pm4py.algo.conformance.alignments.edit_distance import algorithm as logs_alignments
if __name__ == "__main__":
    alignments = logs_alignments.apply(log, simulated_log)

The result is a list of alignments, each one contains a list of moves (sync move, move on log n.1, move on log n.2).

With this utility, it's also possible to perform anti-alignments. In this case, an anti-alignment is corresponding to a trace of the second log that has the biggest edit distance against the given trace of the first log.

from pm4py.algo.conformance.alignments.edit_distance import algorithm as logs_alignments
if __name__ == "__main__":
    parameters = {logs_alignments.Variants.EDIT_DISTANCE.value.Parameters.PERFORM_ANTI_ALIGNMENT: True}
    alignments = logs_alignments.apply(log, simulated_log, parameters=parameters)

Temporal Profile

We propose in pm4py an implementation of the temporal profile model. This has been described in:

Stertz, Florian, Jürgen Mangler, and Stefanie Rinderle-Ma. "Temporal Conformance Checking at Runtime based on Time-infused Process Models." arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.07262 (2020).

A temporal profile measures for every couple of activities in the log the average time and the standard deviation between events having the provided activities. The time is measured between the completion of the first event and the start of the second event. Hence, it is assumed to work with an interval log where the events have two timestamps. The output of the temporal profile discovery is a dictionary where each couple of activities (expressed as a tuple) is associated to a couple of numbers, the first is the average and the second is the average standard deviation.

It is possible to use a temporal profile to perform conformance checking on an event log. The times between the couple of activities in the log are assessed against the numbers stored in the temporal profile. Specifically, a value is calculated that shows how many standard deviations the value is different from the average. If that value exceeds a threshold (by default set to 6, according to the six-sigma principles), then the couple of activities is signaled.

The output of conformance checking based on a temporal profile is a list containing the deviations for each case in the log. Each deviation is expressed as a couple of activities, along with the calculated value and the distance (based on number of standard deviations) from the average.

We provide an example of conformance checking based on a temporal profile.

import pm4py
from pm4py.algo.discovery.temporal_profile import algorithm as temporal_profile_discovery

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes("tests/input_data/receipt.xes")
    temporal_profile = temporal_profile_discovery.apply(log)
                                

from pm4py.algo.conformance.temporal_profile import algorithm as temporal_profile_conformance
if __name__ == "__main__":
    results = temporal_profile_conformance.apply(log, temporal_profile)
                                

Some parameters can be used in order to customize the conformance checking of the temporal profile:

LTL Checking

LTL Checking is a form of filtering/conformance checking in which some rules are verified against the process executions contained in the log.

This permits to check more complex patterns such as:

• Four eyes principle: two given activities should be executed by two different people. For example, the approval of an expense refund should be generally done by a different person rather than the insertion of the expense refund.
• Activity repeated by different people: the same activity in a process execution is repeated (that means rework) from different people.

The verification of LTL rules requires the insertion of the required parameters (of the specific rule). Hence, this form of conformance checking is not automatic.

The LTL rules that are implemented in pm4py are found in the following table:

The rules can be applied on both traditional event logs (XES) and Pandas dataframes, by looking at the packages pm4py.algo.filtering.log.ltl and pm4py.algo.filtering.pandas.ltl respectively.

Importing/Exporting Process Trees

In pm4py, we offer support for importing/exporting process trees in the PTML format.

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    tree = pm4py.read_ptml("tests/input_data/running-example.ptml")
                                

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    pm4py.write_ptml(tree, "running-example.ptml")
                                

Generation of process trees

The approach 'PTAndLogGenerator', described by the scientific paper 'PTandLogGenerator: A Generator for Artificial Event Data', has been implemented in the pm4py library.

import pm4py
if __name__ == "__main__":
    tree = pm4py.generate_process_tree()

Generation of a log out of a process tree

import pm4py
if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.play_out(tree)
    print(len(log))

Conversion into Petri net

import pm4py
if __name__ == "__main__":
    net, im, fm = pm4py.convert_to_petri_net(tree)

Visualize a Process Tree

if __name__ == "__main__":
    print(tree)

import pm4py
if __name__ == "__main__":
    pm4py.view_process_tree(tree, format='png')

Converting a Petri net to a Process Tree

We propose an approach to convert a block-structured accepting Petri net to a process tree. The implement approach is:

van Zelst, Sebastiaan J. "Translating Workflow Nets to Process Trees: An Algorithmic Approach." arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.08213 (2020).

The approach, given an accepting Petri net, returns a process tree if the Petri net is block-structured, while it raises an exception if the Petri net is not block-structured.

import pm4py
import os

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "running-example.xes"))
    net, im, fm = pm4py.discover_petri_net_alpha(log)

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    tree = pm4py.convert_to_process_tree(net, im, fm)
    print(tree)
                                

The method succeeds, since the accepting Petri net is block-structured, and discovers a process tree (incidentally, the same process tree as if the inductive miner was applied).

Frequency Annotation of a Process Tree

A process tree does not include any frequency/performance annotation by default.

A log can be matched against a process tree in an optimal way using the alignments algorithm. The results of the alignments algorithm contains the list of leaves/operators visited during the replay. This can be used to infer the frequency at the case/event level of every node of the process tree.

import pm4py
from pm4py.algo.conformance.alignments.process_tree.util import search_graph_pt_frequency_annotation
if __name__ == "__main__":
    aligned_traces = pm4py.conformance_diagnostics_alignments(log, tree)
    tree = search_graph_pt_frequency_annotation.apply(tree, aligned_traces)
                                

from pm4py.visualization.process_tree import visualizer as pt_visualizer
if __name__ == "__main__":
    gviz = pt_visualizer.apply(tree, parameters={"format": "svg"}, variant=pt_visualizer.Variants.FREQUENCY_ANNOTATION)
    pt_visualizer.view(gviz)
                                

Automatic Feature Selection

In pm4py, we offer ways to perform an automatic feature selection. As example, let us import the receipt log and perform an automatic feature selection on top of it.

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes("tests/input_data/receipt.xes")
    log = pm4py.convert_to_event_log(log)
                                

from pm4py.algo.transformation.log_to_features import algorithm as log_to_features

if __name__ == "__main__":
    data, feature_names = log_to_features.apply(log)
    print(feature_names)
                                

Printing the value feature_names, we see that the following attributes were selected:

• The attribute channel at the trace level (this assumes values Desk, Intern, Internet, Post, e-mail)
• The attribute department at the trace level (this assumes values Customer contact, Experts, General)
• The attribute group at the event level (this assumes values EMPTY, Group 1, Group 12, Group 13, Group 14, Group 15, Group 2, Group 3, Group 4, Group 7).

No numeric attribute value is selected. If we print feature_names, we get the following representation:

[‘trace:channel@Desk’, ‘trace:channel@Intern’, ‘trace:channel@Internet’, ‘trace:channel@Post’, ‘trace:channel@e-mail’, ‘trace:department@Customer contact’, ‘trace:department@Experts’, ‘trace:department@General’, ‘event:org:group@EMPTY’, ‘event:org:group@Group 1’, ‘event:org:group@Group 12’, ‘event:org:group@Group 13’, ‘event:org:group@Group 14’, ‘event:org:group@Group 15’, ‘event:org:group@Group 2’, ‘event:org:group@Group 3’, ‘event:org:group@Group 4’, ‘event:org:group@Group 7’]

So, we see that we have different features for different values of the attribute. This is called one-hot encoding. Actually, a case is assigned to 0 if it does not contain an event with the given value for the attribute; a case is assigned to 1 if it contains at least one event with the attribute.

import pandas as pd
if __name__ == "__main__":
    df = pd.DataFrame(data, columns=feature_names)
    print(df)
                                

We can see the features assigned to each different case.

Manual feature selection

The manual feature selection permits to specify which attributes should be included in the feature selection. These may include for example:

• The activities performed in the process execution (contained usually in the event attribute concept:name ).
• The resources that perform the process execution (contained usually in the event attribute org:resource ).
• Some numeric attributes, at discretion of the user.

To do so, we have to call the method log_to_features.apply. The types of features that can be considered by a manual feature selection are:

Let’s consider for example a feature selection where we are interested to:

• If a process execution contains, or not, an activity.
• If a process execution contains, or not, a resource.
• If a process execution contains, or not, a directly-follows path between different activities.
• If a process execution contains, or not, a directly-follows path between different resources.

from pm4py.algo.transformation.log_to_features import algorithm as log_to_features

if __name__ == "__main__":
    data, feature_names = log_to_features.apply(log, parameters={"str_ev_attr": ["concept:name", "org:resource"], "str_tr_attr": [], "num_ev_attr": [], "num_tr_attr": [], "str_evsucc_attr": ["concept:name", "org:resource"]})
    print(len(feature_names))
                                

Calculating useful features

Other features are for example the cycle and the lead time associated to a case.

Here, we may suppose to have:

• A log with lifecycles, where each event is instantaneous
• OR an interval log, where events may be associated to two timestamps (start and end timestamp).

from pm4py.objects.log.util import interval_lifecycle
if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = interval_lifecycle.to_interval(log)
                                

from pm4py.objects.log.util import interval_lifecycle
from pm4py.util import constants

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = interval_lifecycle.assign_lead_cycle_time(log, parameters={
        constants.PARAMETER_CONSTANT_START_TIMESTAMP_KEY: "start_timestamp",
        constants.PARAMETER_CONSTANT_TIMESTAMP_KEY: "time:timestamp"})
                                

After the provision of the start timestamp attribute (in this case, start_timestamp) and of the timestamp attribute (in this case, time:timestamp), the following features are returned by the method:

• @@approx_bh_partial_cycle_time => incremental cycle time associated to the event (the cycle time of the last event is the cycle time of the instance)
• @@approx_bh_partial_lead_time => incremental lead time associated to the event
• @@approx_bh_overall_wasted_time => difference between the partial lead time and the partial cycle time values
• @@approx_bh_this_wasted_time => wasted time ONLY with regards to the activity described by the ‘interval’ event
• @@approx_bh_ratio_cycle_lead_time => measures the incremental Flow Rate (between 0 and 1).

from pm4py.algo.transformation.log_to_features import algorithm as log_to_features

if __name__ == "__main__":
    data, feature_names = log_to_features.apply(log, parameters={"str_ev_attr": ["concept:name", "org:resource"], "str_tr_attr": [], "num_ev_attr": ["@@approx_bh_partial_cycle_time", "@@approx_bh_partial_lead_time",  "@@approx_bh_overall_wasted_time", "@@approx_bh_this_wasted_time", "@approx_bh_ratio_cycle_lead_time"], "num_tr_attr": [], "str_evsucc_attr": ["concept:name", "org:resource"]})
                                

We provide also the calculation of additional intra/inter case features, which can be enabled as additional boolean parameters of the log_to_features.apply method. These include:

• ENABLE_CASE_DURATION: enables the case duration as additional feature.
• ENABLE_TIMES_FROM_FIRST_OCCURRENCE: enables the addition of the times from start of the case, to the end of the case, from the first occurrence of an activity of a case.
• ENABLE_TIMES_FROM_LAST_OCCURRENCE: enables the addition of the times from start of the case, to the end of the case, from the last occurrence of an activity of a case.
• ENABLE_DIRECT_PATHS_TIMES_LAST_OCC: add the duration of the last occurrence of a directed (i, i+1) path in the case as feature.
• ENABLE_INDIRECT_PATHS_TIMES_LAST_OCC: add the duration of the last occurrence of an indirect (i, j) path in the case as feature.
• ENABLE_WORK_IN_PROGRESS: enables the work in progress (number of concurrent cases) as a feature.
• ENABLE_RESOURCE_WORKLOAD: enables the resource workload as a feature.

PCA – Reducing the number of features

Some techniques (such as the clustering, prediction, anomaly detection) suffer if the dimensionality of the dataset is too high. Hence, a dimensionality reduction technique (as PCA) helps to cope with the complexity of the data.

import pandas as pd

if __name__ == "__main__":
    df = pd.DataFrame(data, columns=feature_names)
                                

It is possible to reduce the number of features using a techniques like PCA.

from sklearn.decomposition import PCA

if __name__ == "__main__":
    pca = PCA(n_components=5)
    df2 = pd.DataFrame(pca.fit_transform(df))
                                

So, from more than 400 columns, we pass to 5 columns that contains most of the variance.

Anomaly Detection

In this section, we consider the calculation of an anomaly score for the different cases. This is based on the features extracted; and to work better requires the application of a dimensionality reduction technique (such as the PCA in the previous section).

from sklearn.ensemble import IsolationForest
if __name__ == "__main__":
    model=IsolationForest()
    model.fit(df2)
    df2["scores"] = model.decision_function(df2)
                                

if __name__ == "__main__":
    df2["@@index"] = df2.index
    df2 = df2[["scores", "@@index"]]
    df2 = df2.sort_values("scores")
    print(df2)
                                

Evolution of the Features

We may be interested to evaluate the evolution of the features over time, to identify the positions of the event log with a behavior that is different from the mainstream behavior.

In pm4py, we provide a method to graph the evolution of features over the time.

import os
import pm4py
from pm4py.algo.transformation.log_to_features.util import locally_linear_embedding
from pm4py.visualization.graphs import visualizer

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "receipt.xes"))
    x, y = locally_linear_embedding.apply(log)
    gviz = visualizer.apply(x, y, variant=visualizer.Variants.DATES,
                            parameters={"title": "Locally Linear Embedding", "format": "svg", "y_axis": "Intensity"})
    visualizer.view(gviz)
                                

Event-based Feature Extraction

Some machine learning methods (for example, LSTM-based deep learning) do not require a specification of the features at the case level (in that, every case is transformed to a single vector of numerical features), but require the specification of a numerical row for each event of the case, containing the features of the given event.

from pm4py.algo.transformation.log_to_features import algorithm as log_to_features

if __name__ == "__main__":
    data, features = log_to_features.apply(log, variant=log_to_features.Variants.EVENT_BASED)
                                

from pm4py.algo.transformation.log_to_features import algorithm as log_to_features

if __name__ == "__main__":
    data, features = log_to_features.apply(log, variant=log_to_features.Variants.EVENT_BASED, parameters={"str_ev_attr": ["concept:name"], "num_ev_attr": []})
                                

Decision tree about the ending activity of a process

Decision trees are objects that help the understandement of the conditions leading to a particular outcome. In this section, several examples related to the construction of the decision trees are provided.

Ideas behind the building of decision trees are provided in scientific paper: de Leoni, Massimiliano, Wil MP van der Aalst, and Marcus Dees. 'A general process mining framework for correlating, predicting and clustering dynamic behavior based on event logs.'

The general scheme is the following:

• A representation of the log, on a given set of features, is obtained (for example, using one-hot encoding on string attributes and keeping numeric attributes as-they-are)
• A representation of the target classes is constructed
• The decision tree is calculated
• The decision tree is represented in some ways

A process instance may potentially finish with different activities, signaling different outcomes of the process instance. A decision tree may help to understand the reasons behind each outcome.

import os
import pm4py
log = pm4py.read_xes(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "roadtraffic50traces.xes"))
log = pm4py.convert_to_event_log(log)

from pm4py.algo.transformation.log_to_features import algorithm as log_to_features

if __name__ == "__main__":
    data, feature_names = log_to_features.apply(log, parameters={"str_tr_attr": [], "str_ev_attr": ["concept:name"], "num_tr_attr": [], "num_ev_attr": ["amount"]})

data, feature_names = log_to_features.apply(log)

import pandas as pd
if __name__ == "__main__":
    dataframe = pd.DataFrame(data, columns=feature_names)
                                

if __name__ == "__main__":
    dataframe.to_csv("features.csv", index=False)
                                

from pm4py.objects.log.util import get_class_representation
if __name__ == "__main__":
    target, classes = get_class_representation.get_class_representation_by_str_ev_attr_value_value(log, "concept:name")

from sklearn import tree
if __name__ == "__main__":
    clf = tree.DecisionTreeClassifier()
    clf.fit(data, target)

    from pm4py.visualization.decisiontree import visualizer as dectree_visualizer
    gviz = dectree_visualizer.apply(clf, feature_names, classes)

Decision tree about the duration of a case (Root Cause Analysis)

A decision tree about the duration of a case helps to understand the reasons behind an high case duration (or, at least, a case duration that is above the threshold).

import os
import pm4py
if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "roadtraffic50traces.xes"))

    from pm4py.algo.transformation.log_to_features import algorithm as log_to_features

    data, feature_names = log_to_features.apply(log, parameters={"str_tr_attr": [], "str_ev_attr": ["concept:name"], "num_tr_attr": [], "num_ev_attr": ["amount"]})

data, feature_names = log_to_features.apply(log)

from pm4py.objects.log.util import get_class_representation
if __name__ == "__main__":
    target, classes = get_class_representation.get_class_representation_by_trace_duration(log, 2 * 8640000)

from sklearn import tree
if __name__ == "__main__":
    clf = tree.DecisionTreeClassifier()
    clf.fit(data, target)

    from pm4py.visualization.decisiontree import visualizer as dectree_visualizer
    gviz = dectree_visualizer.apply(clf, feature_names, classes)

Decision Mining

Decision mining permits, provided:

• An event log
• A process model (an accepting Petri net)
• A decision point

To retrieve the features of the cases that go in the different directions. This permits, for example, to calculate a decision tree that explains the decisions.

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes("tests/input_data/running-example.xes")
                                

if __name__ == "__main__":
    net, im, fm = pm4py.discover_petri_net_inductive(log)
                                

from pm4py.visualization.petri_net import visualizer

if __name__ == "__main__":
    gviz = visualizer.apply(net, im, fm, parameters={visualizer.Variants.WO_DECORATION.value.Parameters.DEBUG: True})
    visualizer.view(gviz)
                                

For this example, we choose the decision point p_10. There, a decision, is done between the activities examine casually and examine throughly.

from pm4py.algo.decision_mining import algorithm as decision_mining

if __name__ == "__main__":
    X, y, class_names = decision_mining.apply(log, net, im, fm, decision_point="p_10")
                                

As we see, the outputs of the apply method are the following:

• X: a Pandas dataframe containing the features associated to the cases leading to a decision.
• y: a Pandas dataframe, that is a single column, containing the number of the class that is the output of the decision (in this case, the values possible are 0 and 1, since we have two target classes)
• class_names: the names of the output classes of the decision (in this case, examine casually and examine thoroughly).

These outputs can be used in a generic way with any classification or comparison technique.

In particular, decision trees can be useful. We provide a function to automate the discovery of decision trees out of the decision mining technique.

from pm4py.algo.decision_mining import algorithm as decision_mining

if __name__ == "__main__":
    clf, feature_names, classes = decision_mining.get_decision_tree(log, net, im, fm, decision_point="p_10")
                                

from pm4py.visualization.decisiontree import visualizer as tree_visualizer

if __name__ == "__main__":
    gviz = tree_visualizer.apply(clf, feature_names, classes)
                                

Feature Extraction on Dataframes

While the feature extraction that is described in the previous sections is generic, it could not be the optimal choice (in terms of performance in the feature extraction) when working on Pandas dataframes.

We offer also the possibility to extract a feature table, that requires the provision of the dataframe and of a set of columns to extract as features, and outputs another dataframe having the following columns:

• The case identifier.
• For each string column that has been provided as attribute, an one-hot encoding (counting the number of occurrences of the given attribute value) for all the possible values is performed.
• For every numeric column that has been provided as attribute, the last value of the attribute in the case is kept.

import pm4py
import pandas as pd
from pm4py.objects.log.util import dataframe_utils

if __name__ == "__main__":
    dataframe = pd.read_csv("tests/input_data/roadtraffic100traces.csv")
    dataframe = pm4py.format_dataframe(dataframe)
    feature_table = dataframe_utils.get_features_df(dataframe, ["concept:name", "amount"])
                                

The feature table will contain, in the aforementioned example, the following columns:

['case:concept:name', 'concept:name_CreateFine', 'concept:name_SendFine', 'concept:name_InsertFineNotification', 'concept:name_Addpenalty', 'concept:name_SendforCreditCollection', 'concept:name_Payment', 'concept:name_InsertDateAppealtoPrefecture', 'concept:name_SendAppealtoPrefecture', 'concept:name_ReceiveResultAppealfromPrefecture', 'concept:name_NotifyResultAppealtoOffender', 'amount']

Discovery of a Data Petri net

Given a Petri net, discovered by a classical process discovery algorithm (e.g., the Alpha Miner or the Inductive Miner), we can transform it to a data Petri net by applying the decision mining at every decision point of it, and transforming the resulting decision tree to a guard. An example follows.

import pm4py
if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes("tests/input_data/roadtraffic100traces.xes")
    net, im, fm = pm4py.discover_petri_net_inductive(log)
    from pm4py.algo.decision_mining import algorithm as decision_mining
    net, im, fm = decision_mining.create_data_petri_nets_with_decisions(log, net, im, fm)
                                

if __name__ == "__main__":
    for t in net.transitions:
        if "guard" in t.properties:
            print("")
            print(t)
            print(t.properties["guard"])
                                

Throughput Time

import pm4py
if __name__ == "__main__":
    all_case_durations = pm4py.get_all_case_durations(log)
                                    

Case Arrival/Dispersion Ratio

import pm4py
if __name__ == "__main__":
    case_arrival_ratio = pm4py.get_case_arrival_average(log)
                                    

from pm4py.statistics.traces.generic.log import case_arrival
if __name__ == "__main__":
    case_dispersion_ratio = case_arrival.get_case_dispersion_avg(log, parameters={
        case_arrival.Parameters.TIMESTAMP_KEY: "time:timestamp"})
                                    

Performance Spectrum

The performance spectrum is a novel visualization of the performance of the process of the time elapsed between different activities in the process executions. The performance spectrum has initially been described in:

Denisov, Vadim, et al. "The Performance Spectrum Miner: Visual Analytics for Fine-Grained Performance Analysis of Processes." BPM (Dissertation/Demos/Industry). 2018.

The performance spectrum assumes to work with an event log and a list of activities that are considered to build the spectrum. In the following example, the performance spectrum is built on the receipt event log including the Confirmation of receipt, T04 Determine confirmation of receipt and T10 Determine necessity to stop indication activities.

import pm4py
import os

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "receipt.xes"))
    log = pm4py.convert_to_event_log(log)
    pm4py.view_performance_spectrum(log, ["Confirmation of receipt", "T04 Determine confirmation of receipt",
                                         "T10 Determine necessity to stop indication"], format="svg")
                                    

In the aforementioned example, we see three horizontal lines, corresponding to the activities included in the spectrum, and many oblique lines that represent the elapsed times between two activities. The more obliquous lines are highlighted by a different color.

This permits to identify the timestamps in which the execution was more bottlenecked, and possible patterns (FIFO, LIFO).

Cycle Time and Waiting Time

Two important KPI for a process executions are:

• The Lead Time: the overall time in which the instance was worked, from the start to the end, without considering if it was actively worked or not.
• The Cycle Time: the overall time in which the instance was worked, from the start to the end, considering only the times where it was actively worked.

Within ‘interval’ event logs (that have a start and an end timestamp), it is possible to calculate incrementally the lead time and the cycle time (event per event). The lead time and the cycle time that are reported on the last event of the case are the ones related to the process execution. With this, it is easy to understand which activities of the process have caused a bottleneck (e.g. the lead time increases significantly more than the cycle time).

The algorithm implemented in pm4py start sorting each case by the start timestamp (so, activities started earlier are reported earlier in the log), and is able to calculate the lead and cycle time in all the situations, also the complex ones reported in the following picture:

In the following, we aim to insert the following attributes to events inside a log:
Attributes

from pm4py.objects.log.util import interval_lifecycle
if __name__ == "__main__":
    enriched_log = interval_lifecycle.assign_lead_cycle_time(log)
                                    

With this, an enriched log that contains for each event the corresponding attributes for lead/cycle time is obtained.

Sojourn Time

This statistic work only with interval event logs, i.e., event logs where each event has a start timestamp and a completion timestamp.

The average sojourn time statistic permits to know, for each activity, how much time was spent executing the activity. This is calculated as the average of time passed between the start timestamp and the completion timestamp for the activity's events.

import pm4py
import os

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "interval_event_log.xes"))
                                    

from pm4py.statistics.sojourn_time.log import get as soj_time_get

if __name__ == "__main__":
    soj_time = soj_time_get.apply(log, parameters={soj_time_get.Parameters.TIMESTAMP_KEY: "time:timestamp", soj_time_get.Parameters.START_TIMESTAMP_KEY: "start_timestamp"})
    print(soj_time)
                                    

The same statistic can be applied seamlessy on Pandas dataframes. We provide an alternative class for doing so: pm4py.statistics.sojourn_time.pandas.get

Concurrent Activities

This statistic work only with interval event logs, i.e., event logs where each event has a start timestamp and a completion timestamp.

In an interval event log, the definition of an order between the events is weaker. Different intersections between a couple of events in a case can happen:

• An event where the start timestamp is greater or equal than the completion timestamp of the other.
• An event where the start timestamp is greater or equal than the start timestamp of the other event, but is lower than the completion timestamp of the other event.

In particular, the latter case define an event-based concurrency, where several events are actively executed at the same time.

We might be interested in retrieving the set of activities for which such concurrent execution happens, and the frequency of such occurrence. We offer this type of calculation in pm4py.

import pm4py
import os

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "interval_event_log.xes"))
                                    

from pm4py.statistics.concurrent_activities.log import get as conc_act_get

if __name__ == "__main__":
    conc_act = conc_act_get.apply(log, parameters={conc_act_get.Parameters.TIMESTAMP_KEY: "time:timestamp", conc_act_get.Parameters.START_TIMESTAMP_KEY: "start_timestamp"})
    print(conc_act)
                                    

The same statistic can be applied seamlessy on Pandas dataframes. We provide an alternative class for doing so: pm4py.statistics.concurrent_activities.pandas.get

Eventually-Follows Graph

We provide an approach for the calculation of the eventually-follows graph. The eventually-follows graph (EFG) is a graph that represents the partial order of the events inside the process executions of the log.

Our implementation can be applied to both lifecycle logs, so logs where each event has only one timestamp, both to interval logs, where each event has a start and a completion timestamp. In the later, the start timestamp is actively considered for the definition of the EFG / partial order

In particular, the method assumes to work with lifecycle logs when a start timestamp is NOT passed in the parameters, while it assumes to work with interval logs when a start timestamp is passed in the parameters.

import pm4py
import os

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "interval_event_log.xes"))
                                    

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    efg_graph = pm4py.discover_eventually_follows_graph(log)
                                    

Displaying Graphs

Graphs permits to understand several aspects of the current log (for example, the distribution of a numeric attribute, or the distribution of case duration, or the events over time).

Distribution of case duration

import os
import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log_path = os.path.join("tests","input_data","receipt.xes")
    log = pm4py.read_xes(log_path)

    from pm4py.util import constants
    from pm4py.statistics.traces.generic.log import case_statistics
    x, y = case_statistics.get_kde_caseduration(log, parameters={constants.PARAMETER_CONSTANT_TIMESTAMP_KEY: "time:timestamp"})

    from pm4py.visualization.graphs import visualizer as graphs_visualizer

    gviz = graphs_visualizer.apply_plot(x, y, variant=graphs_visualizer.Variants.CASES)
    graphs_visualizer.view(gviz)

    gviz = graphs_visualizer.apply_semilogx(x, y, variant=graphs_visualizer.Variants.CASES)
    graphs_visualizer.view(gviz)
                                    

Distribution of events over time

from pm4py.algo.filtering.log.attributes import attributes_filter

if __name__ == "__main__":
    x, y = attributes_filter.get_kde_date_attribute(log, attribute="time:timestamp")

    from pm4py.visualization.graphs import visualizer as graphs_visualizer

    gviz = graphs_visualizer.apply_plot(x, y, variant=graphs_visualizer.Variants.DATES)
    graphs_visualizer.view(gviz)
                                    

Distribution of a numeric attribute

import os
import pm4py

log_path = os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "roadtraffic100traces.xes")

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes(log_path)
    log = pm4py.convert_to_event_log(log)

    from pm4py.algo.filtering.log.attributes import attributes_filter

    x, y = attributes_filter.get_kde_numeric_attribute(log, "amount")

    from pm4py.visualization.graphs import visualizer as graphs_visualizer

    gviz = graphs_visualizer.apply_plot(x, y, variant=graphs_visualizer.Variants.ATTRIBUTES)
    graphs_visualizer.view(gviz)

    from pm4py.visualization.graphs import visualizer as graphs_visualizer

    gviz = graphs_visualizer.apply_semilogx(x, y, variant=graphs_visualizer.Variants.ATTRIBUTES)
    graphs_visualizer.view(gviz)
                                    

Dotted Chart

The dotted chart is a classic visualization of the events inside an event log across different dimensions. Each event of the event log is corresponding to a point. The dimensions are projected on a graph having:

• X axis: the values of the first dimension are represented there.
• Y-axis: the values of the second dimension are represented there.
• Color: the values of the third dimension are represented as different colors for the points of the dotted chart.

The values can be either string, numeric or date values, and are managed accordingly by the dotted chart.

The dotted chart can be built on different attributes. A convenient choice for the dotted chart is to visualize the distribution of cases and events over the time, with the following choices:

• X-axis: the timestamp of the event.
• Y-axis: the index of the case inside the event log.
• Color: the activity of the event.

The aforementioned choice permits to identify visually patterns such as:

• Batches.
• Variations in the case arrival rate.
• Variations in the case finishing rate.

In the following examples, we will build and visualize the dotted chart based on different selections of the attributes (default and custom).

import pm4py
import os

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "receipt.xes"))
    pm4py.view_dotted_chart(log, format="svg")
                                    

import pm4py
import os

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "receipt.xes"))
    pm4py.view_dotted_chart(log, format="svg", attributes=["concept:name", "org:resource", "org:group"])
                                    

Events Distribution

Observing the distribution of events over time permits to infer useful information about the work shifts, the working days, and the period of the year that are more or less busy.

import pm4py
import os

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "receipt.xes"))
    pm4py.view_events_distribution_graph(log, distr_type="days_week", format="svg")
                                    

The possible values for the parameter distr_type are:

• hours: plots the distribution over the hours of a day.
• days_week: plots the distribution over the days of a week.
• days_month: plots the distribution over the days of a month.
• months: plots the distribution over the months of a year.
• yearsr: plots the distribution over the different years of the log.

Detection of Batches

We say that an activity is executed in batches by a given resource when the resource executes several times the same activity in a short period of time.

Identifying such activities may identify points of the process that can be automated, since the activity of the person may be repetitive.

import pm4py
import os

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "receipt.xes"))
    from pm4py.algo.discovery.batches import algorithm
    batches = algorithm.apply(log)
                        

if __name__ == "__main__":
    for act_res in batches:
        print("")
        print("activity: "+act_res[0][0]+" resource: "+act_res[0][1])
        print("number of distinct batches: "+str(act_res[1]))
        for batch_type in act_res[2]:
            print(batch_type, len(act_res[2][batch_type]))
                                    

There are indeed different types of batches that are detected by our method:

• Simultaneous: all the events in the batch have identical start and end timestamps.
• Batching at start: all the events in the batch have identical start timestamp.
• Batching at end: all the events in the batch have identical end timestamp.
• Sequential batching: for all the consecutive events, the end of the first is equal to the start of the second.
• Concurrent batching: for all the consecutive events that are not sequentially matched.

Rework (activities)

The rework statistic permits to identify the activities which have been repeated during the same process execution. This shows the underlying inefficiencies in the process.

In our implementation, the rework takes into account an event log / Pandas dataframe and returns a dictionary associating to each activity the number of cases containing the rework for the given activity.

import pm4py
import os

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "receipt.xes"))
    rework = pm4py.get_rework_cases_per_activity(log)
                                    

Rework (cases)

We define as rework at the case level the number of events of a case having an activity which has appeared previously in the case.

For example, if a case contains the following activities: A,B,A,B,C,D; the rework is 2 since the events in position 3 and 4 are referring to activities that have already been included previously.

The rework statistic can be useful to identify the cases in which many events are repetitions of activities that have already been performed.

import pm4py
from pm4py.statistics.rework.cases.log import get as cases_rework_get

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes("tests/input_data/running-example.xes")
    log = pm4py.convert_to_event_log(log)

    dictio = cases_rework_get.apply(log)
                                    

Query Structure - Paths over Time

We provide a feature to include the information over the paths contained in the event log in a data structure that is convenient to query in a specific point of time or an interval. This is done using an interval tree data structure.

This can be useful to compute quickly the workload of the resources in a given interval of time, or to measure the number of open cases in a time interval.

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes("tests/input_data/receipt.xes")

    from pm4py.algo.transformation.log_to_interval_tree import algorithm as log_to_interval_tree

    it = log_to_interval_tree.apply(log)
                                    

from collections import Counter
if __name__ == "__main__":
    intersecting_events = it[1318333540:1318333540+30*86400]
    res_workload = Counter(x.data["target_event"]["org:resource"] for x in intersecting_events)
                                    

from collections import Counter
if __name__ == "__main__":
    intersecting_events = it[1318333540:1318333540+30*86400]
    open_paths = Counter((x.data["source_event"]["concept:name"], x.data["target_event"]["concept:name"]) for x in intersecting_events)
                                    

Playout of a Petri Net

A playout of a Petri net takes as input a Petri net along with an initial marking, and returns a list of process executions that are allowed from the process model.

We offer different types of playouts:

The list of parameters for such variants are:
Inspect parameters

from pm4py.algo.simulation.playout.petri_net import algorithm as simulator

if __name__ == "__main__":
    simulated_log = simulator.apply(net, im, variant=simulator.Variants.BASIC_PLAYOUT, parameters={simulator.Variants.BASIC_PLAYOUT.value.Parameters.NO_TRACES: 50})
                                    

from pm4py.algo.simulation.playout.petri_net import algorithm as simulator

if __name__ == "__main__":
    simulated_log = simulator.apply(net, im, variant=simulator.Variants.EXTENSIVE, parameters={simulator.Variants.EXTENSIVE.value.Parameters.MAX_TRACE_LENGTH: 7})
                                    

Monte Carlo Simulation

import os
import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "running-example.xes"))
    log = pm4py.convert_to_event_log(log)
    dfg_perf, sa, ea = pm4py.discover_performance_dfg(log)
                                    

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    ratio = pm4py.get_rework_cases_per_activity(log)
    print(ratio)
                                    

Using the DFG mining approach, it is possible to retrieve a Petri net model from the DFG. This kind of models is the “default” one for Monte Carlo simulation (because its execution semantics is very clear). Moreover, the Petri net extracted by the DFG mining approach is a sound workflow net (that gives other good properties to the model).

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    net, im, fm = pm4py.convert_to_petri_net(dfg_perf, sa, ea)
                                    

from pm4py.algo.simulation.montecarlo import algorithm as montecarlo_simulation
from pm4py.algo.conformance.tokenreplay.algorithm import Variants

if __name__ == "__main__":
    parameters = {}
    parameters[
        montecarlo_simulation.Variants.PETRI_SEMAPH_FIFO.value.Parameters.TOKEN_REPLAY_VARIANT] = Variants.BACKWARDS
    parameters[montecarlo_simulation.Variants.PETRI_SEMAPH_FIFO.value.Parameters.PARAM_CASE_ARRIVAL_RATIO] = 10800
    simulated_log, res = montecarlo_simulation.apply(log, net, im, fm, parameters=parameters)
                                    

During the replay operation, some debug messages are written to the screen. The main outputs of the simulation process are:

Among res, that is the result of the simulation, we have the following keys:
Inspect outputs

import random
if __name__ == "__main__":
    last_timestamp = max(event["time:timestamp"] for trace in log for event in trace).timestamp()
    first_timestamp = min(event["time:timestamp"] for trace in log for event in trace).timestamp()
    pick_trans = random.choice(list(res["transitions_interval_trees"]))
    print(pick_trans)
    n_div = 10
    i = 0
    while i < n_div:
        timestamp = first_timestamp + (last_timestamp - first_timestamp)/n_div * i
        print("\t", timestamp, len(res["transitions_interval_trees"][pick_trans][timestamp]))
        i = i + 1
                                    

import random
if __name__ == "__main__":
    last_timestamp = max(event["time:timestamp"] for trace in log for event in trace).timestamp()
    first_timestamp = min(event["time:timestamp"] for trace in log for event in trace).timestamp()
    pick_place = random.choice(list(res["places_interval_trees"]))
    print(pick_place)
    n_div = 10
    i = 0
    while i < n_div:
        timestamp = first_timestamp + (last_timestamp - first_timestamp)/n_div * i
        print("\t", timestamp, len(res["places_interval_trees"][pick_place][timestamp]))
        i = i + 1
                                    

The information can be used to build some graphs like these (using external programs such as Microsoft Excel).

The simulation process can be resumed as follows:

• An event log and a model (DFG) is considered.
• Internally in the simulation, a replay operation is done between the log and the model.
• The replay operation leads to the construction of a stochastic map that associates to each transition a probability distribution (for example, a normal distribution, an exponential distribution …). The probability distribution that maximizes the likelihood of the observed values during the replay is chosen. The user can force a specific transition (like exponential) if he wants.
• Moreover, during the replay operation, the frequency of each transition is found. That helps in picking in a “weighted” way one of the transitions enabled in a marking, when the simulation occurs.
• The simulation process occurs. For each one of the trace that are generated (the distance between the start of them is fixed) a thread is spawned, stochastic choices are made. The possibility to use a given place (depending on the maximum number of resources that is possible to use) is given by a semaphore object in Python.
• A maximum amount of time is specified for the simulation. If one or more threads exceed that amount of time, the threads are killed and the corresponding trace is not added to the simulation log.

Hence, several parameters are important in order to perform a Monte Carlo simulation. These parameters, that are inside the petri_semaph_fifo class, are (ordered by importance).
Inspect parameters

Extensive Playout of a Process Tree

An extensive playout operation permits to obtain (up to the provided limits) the entire language of the process model. Doing an extensive playout operation on a Petri net can be incredibly expensive (the reachability graph needs to be explored). Process trees, with their bottom-up structure, permit to obtain the entire language of an event log in a much easier way, starting from the language of the leafs (that is obvious) and then following specific merge rules for the operators.

However, since the language of a process tree can be incredibly vast (when parallel operators are involved) or also infinite (when loops are involved), the extensive playouts is possible up to some limits:

• A specification of the maximum number of occurrences for a loop must be done, if a loop is there. This stops an extensive playout operation at the given number of occurences.
• Since the number of different executions, when loops are involved, is still incredibly big, it is possible to specify the maximum length of a trace to be returned. So, traces that are above the maximum length are automatically discarded.
• For further limiting the number of different executions, the maximum number of traces returned by the algorithm might be provided.

Moreover, from the structure of the process tree, it is easy to infer the minimum length of a trace allowed by the process model (always following the bottom-up approach).

Some reasonable settings for the extensive playout are the following:

• Overall, the maximum number of traces returned by the algorithm is set to 100000.
• The maximum length of a trace that is an output of the playout is, by default, set to the minimum length of a trace accepted by a process tree.
• The maximum number of loops is set to be the minimum length of a trace divided by two.

The list of parameters are:
Inspect parameters

import pm4py
import os

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "receipt.xes"))
                                    

if __name__ == "__main__":
    tree = pm4py.discover_process_tree_inductive(log)
                                    

from pm4py.algo.simulation.playout.process_tree import algorithm as tree_playout

if __name__ == "__main__":
    playout_variant = tree_playout.Variants.EXTENSIVE
    param = tree_playout.Variants.EXTENSIVE.value.Parameters

    simulated_log = tree_playout.apply(tree, variant=playout_variant,
                                       parameters={param.MAX_TRACE_LENGTH: 3, param.MAX_LIMIT_NUM_TRACES: 100000})
    print(len(simulated_log))
                                    

At this point, the extensive playout operation is done.

Handover of Work

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    hw_values = pm4py.discover_handover_of_work_network(log)
                                    

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    pm4py.view_sna(hw_values)
                                    

Subcontracting

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    sub_values = pm4py.discover_subcontracting_network(log)
                                    

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    pm4py.view_sna(sub_values)
                                    

Working Together

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    wt_values = pm4py.discover_working_together_network(log)
                                    

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    pm4py.view_sna(wt_values)
                                    

Similar Activities

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    ja_values = pm4py.discover_activity_based_resource_similarity(log)
                                    

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    pm4py.view_sna(ja_values)
                                    

Roles Discovery

A role is a set of activities in the log that are executed by a similar (multi)set of resources. Hence, it is a specific function into organization. Grouping the activities in roles can help:

An article on roles detection, that has inspired the technique implemented in pm4py, is:

Burattin, Andrea, Alessandro Sperduti, and Marco Veluscek. “Business models enhancement through discovery of roles.” 2013 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining (CIDM). IEEE, 2013.

• In understanding which activities are executed by which roles.
• By understanding roles itself (numerosity of resources for a single activity may not provide enough explanation)

Initially, each activity corresponds to a different role, and is associated to the multiset of his originators. After that, roles are merged according to their similarity, until no more merges are possible.

import pm4py
import os
if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "receipt.xes"))
                                    

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    roles = pm4py.discover_organizational_roles(log)
                                    

We can print the sets of activities that are grouped in roles by doing print([x[0] for x in roles]).

Clustering (SNA results)

Given the results of applying a SNA metric, a clustering operation permits to group the resources that are connected by a meaningful connection in the given metric. For example:

• Clustering the results of the working together metric, individuals that work often together would be inserted in the same group.
• Clustering the results of the similar activities metric, individuals that work on the same tasks would be inserted in the same group.

We provide a baseline method to get a list of groups (where each group is a list of resources) from the specification of the values of a SNA metric. This can be applied as follows on the running-example log and the results of the similar activities metric:

import pm4py
import os

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "running-example.xes"))

    sa_metric = pm4py.discover_activity_based_resource_similarity(log)

    from pm4py.algo.organizational_mining.sna import util
    clustering = util.cluster_affinity_propagation(sa_metric)

Resource Profiles

The profilation of resources from event logs is also possible. We implement the approach described in:

Pika, Anastasiia, et al. "Mining resource profiles from event logs." ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS) 8.1 (2017): 1-30.

Basically, the behavior of a resource can be measured over a period of time with different metrics presented in the paper:

• RBI 1.1 (number of distinct activities): Number of distinct activities done by a resource in a given time interval [t1, t2)
• RBI 1.3 (activity frequency): Fraction of completions of a given activity a, by a given resource r, during a given time slot, [t1, t2), with respect to the total number of activity completions by resource r during [t1, t2)
• RBI 2.1 (activity completions): The number of activity instances completed by a given resource during a given time slot.
• RBI 2.2 (case completions): The number of cases completed during a given time slot in which a given resource was involved.
• RBI 2.3 (fraction case completion): The fraction of cases completed during a given time slot in which a given resource was involved with respect to the total number of cases completed during the time slot.
• RBI 2.4 (average workload): The average number of activities started by a given resource but not completed at a moment in time.
• RBI 3.1 (multitasking): The fraction of active time during which a given resource is involved in more than one activity with respect to the resource's active time.
• RBI 4.3 (average duration activity): The average duration of instances of a given activity completed during a given time slot by a given resource.
• RBI 4.4 (average case duration): The average duration of cases completed during a given time slot in which a given resource was involved.
• RBI 5.1 (interaction two resources): The number of cases completed during a given time slot in which two given resources were involved.
• RBI 5.2 (social position): The fraction of resources involved in the same cases with a given resource during a given time slot with respect to the total number of resources active during the time slot.

The following example calculates these metrics starting from the running-example XES event log:

import os
from pm4py.algo.organizational_mining.resource_profiles import algorithm
import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "running-example.xes"))
    log = pm4py.convert_to_event_log(log)
    # Metric RBI 1.1: Number of distinct activities done by a resource in a given time interval [t1, t2)
    print(algorithm.distinct_activities(log, "2010-12-30 00:00:00", "2011-01-25 00:00:00", "Sara"))
    # Metric RBI 1.3: Fraction of completions of a given activity a, by a given resource r,
    # during a given time slot, [t1, t2), with respect to the total number of activity completions by resource r
    # during [t1, t2)
    print(algorithm.activity_frequency(log, "2010-12-30 00:00:00", "2011-01-25 00:00:00", "Sara", "decide"))
    # Metric RBI 2.1: The number of activity instances completed by a given resource during a given time slot.
    print(algorithm.activity_completions(log, "2010-12-30 00:00:00", "2011-01-25 00:00:00", "Sara"))
    # Metric RBI 2.2: The number of cases completed during a given time slot in which a given resource was involved.
    print(algorithm.case_completions(log, "2010-12-30 00:00:00", "2011-01-25 00:00:00", "Pete"))
    # Metric RBI 2.3: The fraction of cases completed during a given time slot in which a given resource was involved
    # with respect to the total number of cases completed during the time slot.
    print(algorithm.fraction_case_completions(log, "2010-12-30 00:00:00", "2011-01-25 00:00:00", "Pete"))
    # Metric RBI 2.4: The average number of activities started by a given resource but not completed at a moment in time.
    print(algorithm.average_workload(log, "2010-12-30 00:00:00", "2011-01-15 00:00:00", "Mike"))
    # Metric RBI 3.1: The fraction of active time during which a given resource is involved in more than one activity
    # with respect to the resource's active time.
    print(algorithm.multitasking(log, "2010-12-30 00:00:00", "2011-01-25 00:00:00", "Mike"))
    # Metric RBI 4.3: The average duration of instances of a given activity completed during a given time slot by
    # a given resource.
    print(algorithm.average_duration_activity(log, "2010-12-30 00:00:00", "2011-01-25 00:00:00", "Sue", "examine thoroughly"))
    # Metric RBI 4.4: The average duration of cases completed during a given time slot in which a given resource was involved.
    print(algorithm.average_case_duration(log, "2010-12-30 00:00:00", "2011-01-25 00:00:00", "Sue"))
    # Metric RBI 5.1: The number of cases completed during a given time slot in which two given resources were involved.
    print(algorithm.interaction_two_resources(log, "2010-12-30 00:00:00", "2011-01-25 00:00:00", "Mike", "Pete"))
    # Metric RBI 5.2: The fraction of resources involved in the same cases with a given resource during a given time slot
    # with respect to the total number of resources active during the time slot.
    print(algorithm.social_position(log, "2010-12-30 00:00:00", "2011-01-25 00:00:00", "Sue"))
                                    

Organizational Mining

With event logs, we are able to identify groups of resources doing similar activities. As we have seen in the previous sections, we have different ways to detect automatically these groups from event logs:

• Discovering the Similar Activities metric and applying a clustering algorithm to find the groups.
• Applying the roles discovery algorithm (Burattin et al.)

As a third option, an attribute might be there in the events, describing the group that performed the event.

With the term organizational mining, we mean the discovery of behavior-related information specific to an organizational group (e.g. which activities are done by the group?).

We provide an implementation of the approach described in:

Yang, Jing, et al. 'OrgMining 2.0: A Novel Framework for Organizational Model Mining from Event Logs.' arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.12445 (2020).

The approach provides the description of some group-related metrics (local diagnostics). Among these, we have:

• Group Relative Focus: (on a given type of work) specifies how much a resource group performed this type of work compared to the overall workload of the group. It can be used to measure how the workload of a resource group is distributed over different types of work, i.e., work diversification of the group.
• Group Relative Stake: (in a given type of work) specifies how much this type of work was performed by a certain resource group among all groups. It can be used to measure how the workload devoted to a certain type of work is distributed over resource groups in an organizational model, i.e., work participation by different groups.
• Group Coverage: with respect to a given type of work specifies the proportion of members of a resource group that performed this type of work.
• Group Member Contribution: of a member of a resource group with respect to the given type of work specifies how much of this type of work by the group was performed by the member. It can be used to measure how the workload of the entire group devoted to a certain type of work is distributed over the group members.

The following example calculates these metrics starting from the receipt XES event log, and how the information can be exploited, from an attribute that specifies which is the group doing the task:

import pm4py
import os
from pm4py.algo.organizational_mining.local_diagnostics import algorithm as local_diagnostics

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "receipt.xes"))
    log = pm4py.convert_to_event_log(log)
    # this applies the organizational mining from an attribute that is in each event, describing the group that is performing the task.
    ld = local_diagnostics.apply_from_group_attribute(log, parameters={local_diagnostics.Parameters.GROUP_KEY: "org:group"})
    # GROUP RELATIVE FOCUS (on a given type of work) specifies how much a resource group performed this type of work
    # compared to the overall workload of the group. It can be used to measure how the workload of a resource group
    # is distributed over different types of work, i.e., work diversification of the group.
    print("\ngroup_relative_focus")
    print(ld["group_relative_focus"])
    # GROUP RELATIVE STAKE (in a given type of work) specifies how much this type of work was performed by a certain
    # resource group among all groups. It can be used to measure how the workload devoted to a certain type of work is
    # distributed over resource groups in an organizational model, i.e., work participation by different groups.
    print("\ngroup_relative_stake")
    print(ld["group_relative_stake"])
    # GROUP COVERAGE with respect to a given type of work specifies the proportion of members of a resource group that
    # performed this type of work.
    print("\ngroup_coverage")
    print(ld["group_coverage"])
    # GROUP MEMBER CONTRIBUTION of a member of a resource group with respect to the given type of work specifies how
    # much of this type of work by the group was performed by the member. It can be used to measure how the workload
    # of the entire group devoted to a certain type of work is distributed over the group members.
    print("\ngroup_member_contribution")
    print(ld["group_member_contribution"])
                    

Alternatively, the apply_from_clustering_or_roles method of the same class can be used, providing the log as first argument, and the results of the clustering as second argument.

BPMN 2.0 – Importing

import pm4py
import os

if __name__ == "__main__":
    bpmn_graph = pm4py.read_bpmn(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "running-example.bpmn"))
                                    

BPMN 2.0 – Exporting

import pm4py
import os

if __name__ == "__main__":
    pm4py.write_bpmn(bpmn_graph, "ru.bpmn")
                                    

BPMN 2.0 – Layouting

A layouting operation tries to give a good position to the nodes and the edges of the BPMN diagram. For our purposes, we chose an octilinear edges layout.

from pm4py.objects.bpmn.layout import layouter

if __name__ == "__main__":
    bpmn_graph = layouter.apply(bpmn_graph)
                                    

BPMN 2.0 – Conversion to Petri net

A conversion of a BPMN model into a Petri net model enables different pm4py algorithms (such as conformance checking and simulation algorithms), hence is a particularly important operation.

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    net, im, fm = pm4py.convert_to_petri_net(bpmn_graph)
                                    

BPMN 2.0 – Conversion from a process tree

Process trees are important classes of block-structured processes (and the output of the inductive miner algorithm). These models can be easily converted to BPMN models.

import pm4py
import os

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "running-example.xes"))
    log = pm4py.convert_to_event_log(log)
    tree = pm4py.discover_process_tree_inductive(log)
                                    

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    bpmn_graph = pm4py.convert_to_bpmn(tree)
                                    

Filtering activities/paths

Directly-follows graphs can contain a huge number of activities and paths, with some of them being outliers. In this section, we will see how to filter on the activities and paths of the graph, keeping a subset of its behavior.

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes("tests/input_data/running-example.xes")
    dfg, sa, ea = pm4py.discover_directly_follows_graph(log)
    activities_count = pm4py.get_event_attribute_values(log, "concept:name")
                                    

from pm4py.algo.filtering.dfg import dfg_filtering
if __name__ == "__main__":
    dfg, sa, ea, activities_count = dfg_filtering.filter_dfg_on_activities_percentage(dfg, sa, ea, activities_count, 0.2)
                                    

from pm4py.algo.filtering.dfg import dfg_filtering
if __name__ == "__main__":
    dfg, sa, ea, activities_count = dfg_filtering.filter_dfg_on_paths_percentage(dfg, sa, ea, activities_count, 0.2)
                                    

Playout of a DFG

A playout operation on a directly-follows graph is useful to retrieve the traces that are allowed from the directly-follows graph. In this case, a trace is a set of activities visited in the DFG from the start node to the end node. We can assign a probability to each trace (assuming that the DFG represents a Markov chain). In particular, we are interested in getting the most likely traces. In this section, we will see how to perform the playout of a directly-follows graph.

import pm4py
if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes("tests/input_data/running-example.xes")
    dfg, sa, ea = pm4py.discover_directly_follows_graph(log)
    activities_count = pm4py.get_event_attribute_values(log, "concept:name")
                                    

if __name__ == "__main__":
    simulated_log = pm4py.play_out(dfg, sa, ea)
                                    

Alignments on a DFG

A popular conformance checking technique is the one of alignments. Alignments are usually performed on Petri nets; however, this could take time, since the state space of Petri nets can be huge. It is also possible to perform alignments on a directly-follows graph. Since the state space of a directly-follows graph is small, the result is a very efficient computation of alignments. This permits to get quick diagnostics on the activities and paths that are executed in a wrong way. In this section, we will show an example on how to perform alignments between a process execution and a DFG.

import pm4py
if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes("tests/input_data/running-example.xes")
    dfg, sa, ea = pm4py.discover_directly_follows_graph(log)
    activities_count = pm4py.get_event_attribute_values(log, "concept:name")
                                    

if __name__ == "__main__":
    alignments = pm4py.conformance_diagnostics_alignments(simulated_log, dfg, sa, ea)
                                    

The output of the alignments is equivalent to the one obtained against Petri nets. In particular, the output is a list containing for each trace the result of the alignment. Each alignment consists in some moves from the start to the end of both the trace and the DFG. We can have sync moves, moves on log (whether a move in the process execution is not mimicked by the DFG) and moves on model (whether a move is needed in the model that is not supported by the process execution).

Convert Directly-Follows Graph to a Workflow Net

The Directly-Follows Graph is the representation of a process provided by many commercial tools. An idea of Sander Leemans is about converting the DFG into a workflow net that perfectly mimic the DFG. This is called DFG mining. The following steps are useful to load the log, calculate the DFG, convert it into a workflow net and perform alignments.

import pm4py
import os
if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "running-example.xes"))

    from pm4py.algo.discovery.dfg import algorithm as dfg_discovery
    dfg = dfg_discovery.apply(log)

    from pm4py.objects.conversion.dfg import converter as dfg_mining
    net, im, fm = dfg_mining.apply(dfg)

Streaming Package General Structure

In pm4py, we offer support for streaming process mining functionalities, including:

• Streaming process discovery (DFG)
• Streaming conformance checking (footprints and TBR)
• Streaming importing of XES/CSV files

• register(algo): registers a new algorithm to the live event stream (that will be notified when an event is added to the stream.
• append(event): adds an event to the live event stream.

The LiveEventStream processes the incoming events using a thread pool. This helps to manage a “flood” of events using a given number of different threads.

For the streaming algorithms, that are registered to the LiveEventStream, we provide an interface that should be implemented. The following methods should be implemented inside each streaming algorithm:

• _process(event): a method that accepts and process an incoming event.
• _current_result(): a method that returns the current state of the streaming algorithm.

Streaming Process Discovery (Directly-Follows Graph)

The following example will show how to discover a DFG from a stream of events.

from pm4py.streaming.stream.live_event_stream import LiveEventStream

if __name__ == "__main__":
    live_event_stream = LiveEventStream()
                                    

from pm4py.streaming.algo.discovery.dfg import algorithm as dfg_discovery

if __name__ == "__main__":
    streaming_dfg = dfg_discovery.apply()
                                    

if __name__ == "__main__":
    live_event_stream.register(streaming_dfg)
                                    

if __name__ == "__main__":
    live_event_stream.start()
                                    

import os
import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "running-example.xes"))
                                    

import pm4py

if __name__ == "__main__":
    static_event_stream = pm4py.convert_to_event_stream(log)
                                    

if __name__ == "__main__":
    for ev in static_event_stream:
        live_event_stream.append(ev)
                                    

if __name__ == "__main__":
    live_event_stream.stop()
                                    

if __name__ == "__main__":
    dfg, activities, sa, ea = streaming_dfg.get()
                                    

If we do print(dfg) on the running-example.xes log we obtain:

{(‘register request’, ‘examine casually’): 3, (‘examine casually’, ‘check ticket’): 4, (‘check ticket’, ‘decide’): 6, (‘decide’, ‘reinitiate request’): 3, (‘reinitiate request’, ‘examine thoroughly’): 1, (‘examine thoroughly’, ‘check ticket’): 2, (‘decide’, ‘pay compensation’): 3, (‘register request’, ‘check ticket’): 2, (‘check ticket’, ‘examine casually’): 2, (‘examine casually’, ‘decide’): 2, (‘register request’, ‘examine thoroughly’): 1, (‘decide’, ‘reject request’): 3, (‘reinitiate request’, ‘check ticket’): 1, (‘reinitiate request’, ‘examine casually’): 1, (‘check ticket’, ‘examine thoroughly’): 1, (‘examine thoroughly’, ‘decide’): 1}

Streaming Conformance Checking (TBR)

The following examples will show how to check conformance against a stream of events with the footprints and token-based replay algorithms. For both the examples that follow, we assume to work with the running-example.xes log and with a log discovered using inductive miner infrequent with the default noise threshold (0.2).

import os
import pm4py
if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "receipt.xes"))
                                    

import pm4py
if __name__ == "__main__":
    static_event_stream = pm4py.convert_to_event_stream(log)
                                    

import pm4py
if __name__ == "__main__":
    tree = pm4py.discover_process_tree_inductive(log)
                                    

import pm4py
if __name__ == "__main__":
    net, im, fm = pm4py.convert_to_petri_net(tree)
                                    

Now, we can apply the streaming TBR.

from pm4py.streaming.stream.live_event_stream import LiveEventStream
if __name__ == "__main__":
    live_event_stream = LiveEventStream()
                                    

from pm4py.streaming.algo.conformance.tbr import algorithm as tbr_algorithm
if __name__ == "__main__":
    streaming_tbr = tbr_algorithm.apply(net, im, fm)
                                    

if __name__ == "__main__":
    live_event_stream.register(streaming_tbr)
                                    

if __name__ == "__main__":
    live_event_stream.start()
                                    

if __name__ == "__main__":
    for ev in static_event_stream:
        live_event_stream.append(ev)
                                    

if __name__ == "__main__":
    live_event_stream.stop()
                                    

if __name__ == "__main__":
    conf_stats = streaming_tbr.get()
    print(conf_stats)
                                    

In addition to this, the following methods are available inside the streaming TBR that print some warning during the replay. The methods can be overriden easily (for example, to send the message with mail):

• message_case_or_activity_not_in_event
• message_activity_not_possible
• message_missing_tokens
• message_case_not_in_dictionary
• message_final_marking_not_reached

Streaming Conformance Checking (footprints)

Footprints is another conformance checking method offered in pm4py, which can be implemented in the context of streaming events. In the following, we see an application of the streaming footprints.

if __name__ == "__main__":
    from pm4py.algo.discovery.footprints import algorithm as fp_discovery
    footprints = fp_discovery.apply(tree)
                                    

if __name__ == "__main__":
    from pm4py.streaming.stream.live_event_stream import LiveEventStream
    live_event_stream = LiveEventStream()
                                    

if __name__ == "__main__":
    from pm4py.streaming.algo.conformance.footprints import algorithm as fp_conformance
    streaming_footprints = fp_conformance.apply(footprints)
                                    

if __name__ == "__main__":
    live_event_stream.register(streaming_footprints)
                                    

if __name__ == "__main__":
    live_event_stream.start()
                                    

if __name__ == "__main__":
    for ev in static_event_stream:
        live_event_stream.append(ev)
                                    

if __name__ == "__main__":
    live_event_stream.stop()
                                    

if __name__ == "__main__":
    conf_stats = streaming_footprints.get()
    print(conf_stats)
                                    

In addition to this, the following methods are available inside the streaming footprints that print some warning during the replay. The methods can be overriden easily (for example, to send the message with mail):

• message_case_or_activity_not_in_event
• message_activity_not_possible
• message_footprints_not_possible
• message_start_activity_not_possible
• message_end_activity_not_possible
• message_case_not_in_dictionary

Streaming Conformance Checking (Temporal Profile)

We propose in pm4py an implementation of the temporal profile model. This has been described in:

Stertz, Florian, Jürgen Mangler, and Stefanie Rinderle-Ma. "Temporal Conformance Checking at Runtime based on Time-infused Process Models." arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.07262 (2020).

A temporal profile measures for every couple of activities in the log the average time and the standard deviation between events having the provided activities. The time is measured between the completion of the first event and the start of the second event. Hence, it is assumed to work with an interval log where the events have two timestamps. The output of the temporal profile discovery is a dictionary where each couple of activities (expressed as a tuple) is associated to a couple of numbers, the first is the average and the second is the average standard deviation.

It is possible to use a temporal profile to perform conformance checking on an event log. The times between the couple of activities in the log are assessed against the numbers stored in the temporal profile. Specifically, a value is calculated that shows how many standard deviations the value is different from the average. If that value exceeds a threshold (by default set to 6, according to the six-sigma principles), then the couple of activities is signaled.

In pm4py, we provide a streaming conformance checking algorithm based on the temporal profile. The algorithm checks an incoming event against every event that happened previously in the case, identifying deviations according to the temporal profile. This section provides an example where a temporal profile is discovered, the streaming conformance checking is set-up and actually a log is replayed on the stream.

import pm4py
from pm4py.algo.discovery.temporal_profile import algorithm as temporal_profile_discovery

if __name__ == "__main__":
    log = pm4py.read_xes("tests/input_data/running-example.xes")
    temporal_profile = temporal_profile_discovery.apply(log)
                                

from pm4py.streaming.stream.live_event_stream import LiveEventStream
from pm4py.streaming.algo.conformance.temporal import algorithm as temporal_conformance_checker

if __name__ == "__main__":
    stream = LiveEventStream()
    temp_cc = temporal_conformance_checker.apply(temporal_profile)
    stream.register(temp_cc)
    stream.start()
                                

if __name__ == "__main__":
    static_stream = pm4py.convert_to_event_stream(log)
    for event in static_stream:
        stream.append(event)
                                

During the execution of the streaming temporal profile conformance checker, some warnings are printed if a couple of events violate the temporal profile. Moreover, it is also possible to get a dictionary containing the cases with deviations associated with all their deviations.

if __name__ == "__main__":
    stream.stop()
    res = temp_cc.get()
                                

Streaming Importer (XES trace-by-trace)

In order to be able to process the traces of a XES event log that might not fit in the memory, or when a sample of a big log is needed, the usage of the XES trace-by-trace streaming importer helps to cope with the situation.

from pm4py.streaming.importer.xes import importer as xes_importer

if __name__ == "__main__":
    streaming_log_object = xes_importer.apply(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "running-example.xes"), variant=xes_importer.Variants.XES_TRACE_STREAM)
                                    

if __name__ == "__main__":
    for trace in streaming_log_object:
        print(trace)
                                    

Streaming Importer (XES event-by-event)

In order to be able to process the events of a XES event log that might not fit in the memory, or when the sample of a big log is needed, the usage of the XES event-by-event streaming importer helps to cope with the situation. In this case, the single events inside the traces are picked during the iteration.

from pm4py.streaming.importer.xes import importer as xes_importer

if __name__ == "__main__":
    streaming_ev_object = xes_importer.apply(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "running-example.xes"), variant=xes_importer.Variants.XES_EVENT_STREAM)
                                    

if __name__ == "__main__":
    for event in streaming_ev_object:
        print(event)
                                    

Streaming Importer (CSV event-by-event)

In order to be able to process the events of a CSV event log that might not fit in the memory, or when the sample of a big log is needed, Pandas might not be feasible. In this case, the single rows of the CSV file are parsed during the iteration.

from pm4py.streaming.importer.csv import importer as csv_importer
if __name__ == "__main__":
    log_object = csv_importer.apply(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "running-example.csv"))
                                    

if __name__ == "__main__":
    for ev in log_object:
        print(ev)
                                    

OCEL streaming

We offer support for streaming on OCEL. The support is currently limited to:

• Iterating over the events of an OCEL.
• Listening to OCELs to direct them to traditional event listeners.

import pm4py
import os
from pm4py.objects.ocel.util import ocel_iterator

if __name__ == "__main__":
    ocel = pm4py.read_ocel(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "ocel", "example_log.jsonocel"))
    for ev in ocel_iterator.apply(ocel):
        print(ev)
                                    

import pm4py
import os
from pm4py.streaming.stream import live_event_stream
from pm4py.streaming.util import event_stream_printer
from pm4py.streaming.conversion import ocel_flatts_distributor
from pm4py.objects.ocel.util import ocel_iterator

if __name__ == "__main__":
    ocel = pm4py.read_ocel(os.path.join("tests", "input_data", "ocel", "example_log.jsonocel"))
    # we wants to use the traditional algorithms for streaming also on object-centric event logs.
    # for this purpose, first we create two different event streams, one for the "order" object type
    # and one for the "element" object type.
    order_stream = live_event_stream.LiveEventStream()
    element_stream = live_event_stream.LiveEventStream()
    # Then, we register an algorithm for every one of them, which is a simple printer of the received events.
    order_stream_printer = event_stream_printer.EventStreamPrinter()
    element_stream_printer = event_stream_printer.EventStreamPrinter()
    order_stream.register(order_stream_printer)
    element_stream.register(element_stream_printer)
    # Then, we create the distributor object.
    # This registers different event streams for different object types.
    flatts_distributor = ocel_flatts_distributor.OcelFlattsDistributor()
    flatts_distributor.register("order", order_stream)
    flatts_distributor.register("element", element_stream)
    order_stream.start()
    element_stream.start()
    # in this way, we iterate over the events of an OCEL
    for ev in ocel_iterator.apply(ocel):
        # and the OCEL event is sent to all the "flattened" event streams.
        flatts_distributor.append(ev)
        # since the "flattened" event streams register a printer each, what we get is a print
        # of all the events that reach these instances.
    order_stream.stop()
    element_stream.stop()